Compliance Week TV

In our first Compliance Week TV video we hear from Frank Diana, executive vice president of enherent Corporation, who discusses the challenges involved in information management.
Watch the video in full screen now

CPE Credits On Demand!

Subscribers can now earn FREE Continuing Professional Education (CPE) credits by watching Compliance Week Webcasts on critical topics related to corporate compliance and risk -- on demand, so at your convenience! For subscribers only.
Earn CPE for free now

Compliance Week Podcasts …

This week’s podcast features Lucy Marcus, CEO of Marcus Venture Consulting, talking about shareholder and director activism, and how corporate executives can work with them more effectively. Hear the podcast now or …

Follow Compliance Week podcasts on iTunes.

… and Compliance Week on Twitter!

You can also follow Compliance Week Editor Matt Kelly on Twitter, for the latest regulatory observations and updates. More than 2,600 followers and ranked the most influential Twitter feed on compliance!

Compliance Week LinkedIn Group

Visit the Compliance Week has a companion group on LinkedIn, where members can network and discuss the compliance and governance news of the day among themselves. Open to all, free to join.

Webcasts of the Week

Defining and Executing Systematic, Risk-Based Third-Party Due Diligence for FCPA Compliance
Sponsored by The Steele Foundation

Help Wanted: Ad of the Week

Compliance Education & Communications Mgr.
Submitted by Oracle

Event of the Week

Corporate Governance Programs
Courtesy of Harvard Business School

Thought Leadership of the Week

Access Management: Efficiency, Confidence, Control
Courtesy of SAP

The Resource Exchange

Code of Conduct
Submitted by BP

Sample Risk Acceptance Request
Submitted by Circuit City

Featured Databases

Whistleblower Guidelines
Search Whistleblower Policies, Contract Options

Class-Action Filings
Download Text of Class-Action Complaints

GRC Illustrated Series

Improving GRC by Visualizing Your Data
The 24th Installment in This Exclusive Series

Enforcement Action

RSS
“Enforcement Action” is written by Bruce Carton, a former senior counsel in the SEC's Division of Enforcement. A “blawg pioneer” (according to The Wall Street Journal), Carton was the creator of Securities Litigation Watch, a blog that he wrote for more than three years while he was vice president of ISS' Securities Class Action Services. He is now editor of Securities Docket, an online publication that tracks securities litigation and enforcement developments on a global basis. Carton welcomes questions, comments and statements from readers on enforcement and litigation issues; he can be reached via email at BCarton@complianceweek.com.

 

June 30, 2009

“Spousal Immunity” Rejected by Court in SEC Case

The SEC’s ongoing inquiry into possible insider trading in shares of Restoration Hardware has raised some interesting issues of spousal immunity. On Friday, a court ruled that Lena Yan may not avoid testifying before the SEC in its ongoing investigation into possible insider trading by her husband, Daniel Hew.

On June 4, the SEC announced that it had filed a subpoena enforcement action in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against Yan, an analyst in the finance department at Restoration Hardware, Inc. seeking to compel her testimony pursuant to a subpoena. Yan had previously appeared for testimony on May 6, 2009, but refused to answer all substantive questions by invoking two marital-based privileges.

Last week, Yan argued to Judge William Alsup that she should not be forced to give her own testimony in the matter based on her “spousal testimonial privilege.” The Mercury News reports that Yan argued that

“I do not want anything that I say to be used against my husband in any way,” she stated, concerned that the SEC’s attorneys “may have already concluded that my husband is ‘guilty’ of insider trading.” Furthermore, the investigation “has put a significant amount of strain on my marriage, both emotionally and financially, and I do not want to create further stress in our marriage.”

The SEC responded that there could be “staggering” potential ramifications if such a privilege existed in its investigations, and that, in any case, both spouses generally need to maintain the privilege in order for either to claim it. Judge Alsup reportedly ruled for the SEC, and gave Yan 15 business days to show up at the SEC’s San Francisco headquarters to give sworn testimony.

Posted by: bcarton @ 10:45 am

Filed under: Uncategorized

1 Comment »

  1. Under the U.S. Federal Rules of Evidence, this privilege attaches to the witness spouse.

    The appropriate role for a judge to play in a jury trial has been the subject of a number of appeals. Courts have said a trial judge must always remain fair and impartial. Kennedy v. Los Angeles Police Dep’t, 901 F.2d 702, 09 (9th Cir.’89).

    He “must be ever mindful of the sensitive role [the court] plays in a jury trial and avoid even the appearance of advocacy or partiality.” Id. (quoting U.S. v. Harris, 501 F.2d 1, 10 (9th Cir.’74)).

    The judge abused his judicial discretion, however, it is not uncommon!

    Comment by Bull dog — July 1, 2009 @ 12:57 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment