Compliance Week Podcasts …

This week’s podcast features Russ Berland of the law firm Stinson Morrison & Hecker talking about how to use new guidance from the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development as a blueprint for better FCPA compliance programs. Hear the podcast now.

… and Compliance Week on Twitter!

You can also follow Compliance Week Editor Matt Kelly on Twitter, for the latest regulatory observations and updates. More than 2,100 followers and ranked the most influential Twitter feed on compliance!

Compliance Week LinkedIn Group

Visit the Compliance Week has a companion group on LinkedIn, where members can network and discuss the compliance and governance news of the day among themselves. Open to all, free to join.

Webcast of the Week

A Closer Look at FAS 123(R) [now ASC Topic 718]
Sponsored by OptionEase

Help Wanted: Ad of the Week

Chief Ethics & Compliance Officer
Submitted by Morgan Samuels

Event of the Week

Taking the 2, 3-4 or 5-Year NOL
Sponsored by BNA

Thought Leadership of the Week

Global survey into the integration of GRC
Courtesy of KPMG

The Resource Exchange

Sample Risk Acceptance Request
Submitted by Circuit City

Risk Inventory
Submitted by Cognizant Technology

Featured Databases

CEO, CFO Disclosure Certifications
CEO, CFO Certifications From 3,000 Cos.

Management Discussion & Analysis
Compare How Peers Disclose Risk

GRC Illustrated Series

The IFRS Ripple Effect
The 23rd Installment in This Exclusive Series

Compensation Survey

Compliance, Audit & Risk Compensation Survey
Empsight’s 2010 Compensation Survey is now open for participation. It is the leading source of its kind and reports on Fortune 500 and other large multinationals.

Global Integrity Survey

2009 Global Integrity Survey
Download the findings of the 2009 Global Integrity Survey, compiled by Compliance Week and sponsored by Integrity Interactive.

Enforcement Action

RSS
“Enforcement Action” is written by Bruce Carton, a former senior counsel in the SEC's Division of Enforcement. A “blawg pioneer” (according to The Wall Street Journal), Carton was the creator of Securities Litigation Watch, a blog that he wrote for more than three years while he was vice president of ISS' Securities Class Action Services. He is now editor of Securities Docket, an online publication that tracks securities litigation and enforcement developments on a global basis. Carton welcomes questions, comments and statements from readers on enforcement and litigation issues; he can be reached via email at BCarton@complianceweek.com.

 

January 29, 2010

CFTC: Billy Ray and Winthrop Were Not Insider Traders

Earlier this week, Commodity Futures Trading Commission Chairman Gary Gensler clarified that no matter what you might have assumed back in 1983, Billy Ray Valentine (Eddie Murphy) and Louis Winthorpe III (Dan Aykroyd) did not commit insider trading when they made millions trading on orange juice futures in the movie Trading Places. As you may recall, Billy Ray and Winthrop intercepted a confidential Department of Agriculture “crop report” on orange crop forecasts, and used it to successfully sell short and corner the orange juice futures market before the report was publicly announced (and to simultaneously ruin the Duke brothers, who lost $394 million based on a false copy of the report).

In a speech on Wednesday, Gensler reiterated the CFTC’s position that the insider trading laws in the securities world should be expanded to the futures world, making it illegal to trade on non-public information from agencies like the U.S. Treasury, Federal Reserve and Department of Agriculture. Gensler cited “Trading Places” to explain why such an expansion of the law should occur, saying the CFTC wants to implement an “Eddie Murphy” rule.  In real life, he said, Billy Ray and Winthrop’s trading based on “misappropriated government information is actually not illegal under our statute.”

Posted by: bcarton @ 4:28 pm

Filed under: Enforcement, Uncategorized

1 Comment »

  1. I don’t remember the details of the plot, but if they deceptively acquired the material nonpublic information on which they traded, they would be liable under the misappropriation theory, according to the SEC and the Second Circuit (see SEC v. Dorozhko), despite not owing a fiduciary duty to the source of the information.

    Comment by VP — February 8, 2010 @ 9:58 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment