Compliance Week Podcasts …

This week’s podcast features Tom Selling of the AccountingOnion.com talking about obstacles to adopting International Financial Reporting Standards in the United States. Hear the podcast now.

… and Compliance Week on Twitter!

You can also follow Compliance Week Editor Matt Kelly on Twitter, for the latest regulatory observations and updates. More than 2,100 followers and ranked the most influential Twitter feed on compliance!

Compliance Week LinkedIn Group

Visit the Compliance Week has a companion group on LinkedIn, where members can network and discuss the compliance and governance news of the day among themselves. Open to all, free to join.

Webcast of the Week

Visibility Across GRC Initiatives with BPM
Sponsored by Fujitsu

Help Wanted: Ad of the Week

Compliance Counsel
Submitted by Midwest ISO

Event of the Week

International Tax Legislative Update
Sponsored by Vertex

Thought Leadership of the Week

ERM in the Aftermath of the Credit Crisis
Courtesy of Crowe Horwath

The Resource Exchange

Sample Risk Acceptance Request
Submitted by Circuit City

Risk Inventory
Submitted by Cognizant Technology

Featured Databases

Rules, Standards, Guidance
Rules, Guidance From SEC, PCAOB, FASB, More

Internal Controls
Compare Cos.’ Internal Controls Disclosures

GRC Illustrated Series

The IFRS Ripple Effect
The 23rd Installment in This Exclusive Series

Compensation Survey

Compliance, Audit & Risk Compensation Survey
Empsight’s 2010 Compensation Survey is now open for participation. It is the leading source of its kind and reports on Fortune 500 and other large multinationals.

Global Integrity Survey

2009 Global Integrity Survey
Download the findings of the 2009 Global Integrity Survey, compiled by Compliance Week and sponsored by Integrity Interactive.

Accounting & Auditing Update

RSS
The “Accounting & Auditing Update” is written by Tammy Whitehouse, a veteran business writer who has been a regular contributor to Compliance Week since 2005. Her work has also appeared in industry journals and periodicals including Journal of Business Strategy, Strategy & Leadership, Compensation & Benefits Review, Inc, Buyside, and myriad others. Whitehouse welcomes questions and comments from readers; she can be reached via email at twhitehouse@complianceweek.com.

 

November 20, 2008

FASB, IASB Inch Closer to Lease Accounting

The Financial Accounting Standards Board and the International Accounting Standards Board are targeting February 2009 to publish a discussion paper on how they plan to overhaul lease accounting.

The boards met separately this week to hash out a number of areas where they either didn’t share the same view or hadn’t yet considered the issues to try to establish fully converged views on how to write new standards for U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and International Financial Reporting Standards. FASB decided for its part that it wants to see lease terms deemed a recognition issue, which would require entities to make some upfront judgments about their likely obligations over the expected life of the lease if they have some uncertainty about their ultimate obligations.

For example, when an entity has a 10-year lease with an option to renew for another five years, a recognition approach would require the entity to decide for how long it is likely to lease the property or equipment and recognize that term at the front end of the lease. The decision would take into account all contractual, non-contractual, and business factors.

LinsmeierFASB staff and board members were keen to steer clear of language that would be interpreted as commanding detailed number crunching. “It’s not a purely statistically based analysis,” said board member Tom Linsmeier during the Webcast meeting. “That might be a starting point to think about things.”

The Board decided it wants to require entities to make some estimates about what they expect to pay over time when lease terms are measured on factors other than time, such as when leases are based on sales or profitability. FASB determined an entity should be expected to determine its best estimate of the range of possible outcomes and the likelihood of each, but it should not be expected to attach weighted probabilities to each of those outcomes to determine the expected lease payments. If lease terms are based on changes in an index or a rate, however, then measurement should rely on the index or rate at the time of inception with a best estimate of expected lease payments.

The two boards plan to compare notes again from their separate meetings on the various outstanding issues to determine if they can publish the discussion paper with fully converged views or if they may publish various views on specific issues asking constituents to weigh in on the areas of debate.

Posted by: twhitehouse @ 3:05 pm

Filed under: FASB, IASB, Leasing

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment