Close

Are you in compliance?

Don't miss out! Sign up today for our weekly newsletters and stay abreast of important GRC-related information and news.

Get updates on Compliance Week offerings, including new features, databases, research, and other resources, along with announcements of upcoming Webcasts, conferences, seminars, CPE/CLE opportunities and more.

Published every Thursday, Compliance Week Europe offers a condensed summary of risk, audit, and compliance news either originating in Europe, or of special interest to European compliance professionals. This newsletter will follow developments by the European Commission, as well as those of national governments across the region, or any U.S.-based news that might have consequence across the Atlantic. Frequency: weekly; Thursday a.m.

A fresh edition of Compliance Week delivered via e-mail and online every Tuesday morning, relentlessly focused on the disclosure, reporting and compliance requirements of our 25,000+ paying subscribers.

Published every Friday, Compliance Weekend was launched at the behest of subscribers, and offers a quick Plain English review of the week's key developments. We hope you enjoy this supplement to Compliance Week's Tuesday edition.

Australia Should Hold Fire on Exec Pay Laws

Neil Baker | May 26, 2011






The Australian government should not introduce new laws on executive pay levels or disclosure, and should think about scrapping some of the complex regulations that exist already, according to a report from its legal advisor.

The Corporations and Markets Advisory Committee (CMAC), which advises the federal government on company law, proposed new guidance that would make it easier for shareholders to understand how much pay executives were actually taking home. But it warned against major legislative changes to remuneration reporting requirements.

The government asked the committee to review the issue in 2010 after a report on executive pay levels from the Productivity Commission, which advises on policy, highlighted excessive pay levels, compliant boards and soft targets for incentive pay, which it said was a practice imported from the US.

The committee said companies should be allowed to decide how much to pay their staff, but made some suggestions for better disclosure of executive remuneration.

It said companies should explain their governance processes around remuneration, disclose termination payments – including gratuitous payments, and reveal how much executives have actually been paid in the year, with details of any payment deferred to future years.

But it said companies should be allowed to keep secret any commercially sensitive pay information, as long as they reveal that they have done so.

Joanne Rees, head of the committee, said if remuneration reporting improved and became more simple, that “may provide the basis for a fresh non‑prescriptive legislative approach to remuneration reporting at some future time.”