Close

Are you in compliance?

Don't miss out! Sign up today for our weekly newsletters and stay abreast of important GRC-related information and news.

Get updates on Compliance Week offerings, including new features, databases, research, and other resources, along with announcements of upcoming Webcasts, conferences, seminars, CPE/CLE opportunities and more.

Published every Thursday, Compliance Week Europe offers a condensed summary of risk, audit, and compliance news either originating in Europe, or of special interest to European compliance professionals. This newsletter will follow developments by the European Commission, as well as those of national governments across the region, or any U.S.-based news that might have consequence across the Atlantic. Frequency: weekly; Thursday a.m.

A fresh edition of Compliance Week delivered via e-mail and online every Tuesday morning, relentlessly focused on the disclosure, reporting and compliance requirements of our 25,000+ paying subscribers.

Published every Friday, Compliance Weekend was launched at the behest of subscribers, and offers a quick Plain English review of the week's key developments. We hope you enjoy this supplement to Compliance Week's Tuesday edition.

×

Status message

Start your free, no obligation 10-day trial to continue exploring with full access.

Meaningful Loss Contingency Disclosure Could Head Off a FASB Intervention

Scott Taub | January 25, 2011

The Financial Accounting Standards Board suspended deliberations in November on its project to improve disclosure of loss contingencies, including contingencies relating to litigation. The sigh of relief in the corporate reporting and legal communities was palpable.

Most companies will respond to this development by making no changes to the way they prepare disclosures related to loss contingencies. They figure the bullet has been dodged, at least for now.

That reaction is a mistake. Given the reasons why FASB put the project on hold, the prudent reaction would be to improve disclosures and attempt to address the concerns that led FASB to take up the project in the first place, demonstrating to the board that new guidance isn't necessary.

First let's look at the reasoning behind FASB's decision to delay any new proposals on loss contingencies. FASB's minutes are worth quoting at length: “The board directed the staff to work with the staffs of the... To get the full story, subscribe now.