| Home | Topics | Databases | Columnists | Blogs | Webcasts | Events | Resource Exchange | CPE Library | Jobs | Thought Leadership | Directory | Subscribe |
Compliance Week TVWatch the video in full screen now
Follow Compliance Week podcasts on iTunes. |
Webcasts of the Week
|
Help Wanted: Ad of the Week
|
Event of the Week
|
Thought Leadership of the Week
|
The Resource Exchange
|
Featured Databases
|
GRC Illustrated Series
|
![]() |
| Title & Description | Date | Type of Article | |||||
| 1. |
Common Questions About GRC, and Some Answers
Earlier this summer I participated on a panel at the Institute of Internal Auditors international conference, held this year in Atlanta. The subject of the panel was governance, risk, and compliance, covering a range of matters raised by the moderator and enthusiastic participants. Compliance Week readers often have similar issues on their minds, so I’d like to share my responses to some of the questions raised. Since I don’t have notes, I’ll do my best in reconstructing my remarks.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
08/24/10 | Compliance Week Coverage | ||||
| 2. |
How Did BP’s Risk Management Lead to Failure?
We all know the damage caused so far by the explosion of BP’s Deepwater Horizon offshore oil rig in April: 11 workers killed, economic ruin across the Gulf Coast states, environmental ruin along the Gulf Coast itself. And efforts to stop the continuing undersea oil spill keep falling far short of the solution that’s desperately needed.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
07/20/10 | Columns & Editorials | ||||
| 3. |
When to Consider Splitting CEO, Chairman Roles
The question of whether to combine the roles of board chairman and CEO or to separate them generates robust debate, with visceral feelings and often-strained relationships. Many institutional investors and leading governance experts, and indeed many sitting directors, argue in favor of splitting the jobs; many CEOs holding the chairman title insist their authority and the company itself would be badly damaged should they be forced to wear only one hat.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
06/22/10 | Compliance Week Coverage | ||||
| 4. |
Wall Street Can Learn From WaMu’s Meltdown
At hearings of the Senate Permanent Sub-committee on Investigations looking into causes of the financial crisis, Kerry Killinger, CEO of the now-defunct bank Washington Mutual, contended that his company hadn’t been treated fairly. Documents were released that disclosed how he compared liquidity to oxygen—which, he complained, was provided to other banks in distress, but not to WaMu.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
05/18/10 | Columns & Editorials | ||||
| 5. |
Composing a Competent Board of Directors
Does your company have the right directors comprising the board? As a member of the senior management team, it’s certainly of concern to you—and of course the company’s shareholders—to determine whether the men and women providing corporate oversight do the job well. And board members themselves, as they look around the boardroom table, must be comfortable that fellow directors are people you can “go to war” with, your reputation (and possibly personal assets) in their hands.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
04/20/10 | Columns & Editorials | ||||
| 6. |
Learning From Culture Mistakes at Toyota, J&J
Oh, how the mighty have fallen—or at least seen their reputations for quality products and “doing the right thing” for customers badly damaged. Let’s take a look at two recent high-profile cases.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
03/23/10 | Compliance Week Coverage | ||||
| 7. |
Providing Directors the Risk Information They Need
My column last month outlined the kind of information boards of directors need to execute their responsibilities, viewed from the director’s perspective. This month I want to continue that discussion, but looking at the opposite side of the coin: what information chief executives, chief compliance officers, chief risk officers, and other top executives should be providing to help directors in their oversight activities.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
02/17/10 | Columns & Editorials | ||||
| 8. |
How to Manage Communication About Risks
Every corporate director knows he or she needs relevant information to carry out oversight responsibilities effectively. But it’s not easy to know exactly what that information should be, the form it should take, or where it should come from. Unfortunately, experience shows that too often boards of directors don’t sufficiently focus on these issues, get caught by surprise, and pay a high price.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
01/20/10 | Columns & Editorials | ||||
| 9. |
What’s Coming in Governance in 2010
Adhering to a year-end tradition, once again I offer a wish list of governance enhancements I’d like to see in the coming year. So, with fireplace aglow and coffee-mug close by, here’s what we can hope for in 2010.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
12/15/09 | Compliance Week Coverage | ||||
| 10. |
Board of Directors’ Hot Buttons
With memories of the financial crisis still fresh in our minds and questions of “Where were the boards?” still abounding, today’s directors face extraordinary challenges.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
11/17/09 | Columns & Editorials | ||||
| 11. |
New Models for Broken Board Governance System
To say that these are challenging times to be a corporate director is an understatement. Shareholders are clamoring for greater ability to determine what happens in the boardroom and who sits in the seats; the SEC is proposing a host of new rules requiring a broad range of expanded disclosures; the pace of new lawsuits continues unabated. All this occurs with memories still fresh of the financial system’s near collapse, against a backdrop of an economy still struggling emerge from the “Great Recession.”By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
10/20/09 | Compliance Week Coverage | ||||
| 12. |
All Our Governance Mistakes, in One News Cycle
Like most people, I read the daily news … and, unfortunately, little shocks me anymore. Recently, however, I was especially distressed to read—in just one day—how many major companies were found to have gone terribly wrong! The reports shed light on what goes on behind closed doors, and how these organizations’ tone at the top had become so tainted.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
09/22/09 | Columns & Editorials | ||||
| 13. |
The Shareholder Rights Express Rolls On
Well, the shareholder rights express continues to roll down the track.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
08/18/09 | Columns & Editorials | ||||
| 14. |
Management’s Role in Merrill Lynch Downfall
Many people have analyzed the meltdown of platinum-branded financial institutions, amazed at how quickly they went from supposedly sound and powerful to being taken over or filing for bankruptcy. The lessons to be learned, and hopefully not forgotten, are far-reaching at several levels.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
07/21/09 | Compliance Week Coverage | ||||
| 15. |
Will Shareholder Proposals Benefit or Destroy?
The resentment and anger over recent corporate performance, especially in the financial services sector, has gone from bubbling up to boiling over.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
06/23/09 | Compliance Week Coverage | ||||
| 16. |
What Boards Should Know About Groupthink
Last month’s column described the dangers of “keeping up with the Joneses” and how businesses seeking to do so have suffered disastrous consequences. I mentioned two corollaries: the risk of blindly following supposed best practices, and of buying into “groupthink.” We explored the former risk in detail last month; this month I want to turn to the latter.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
05/19/09 | Columns & Editorials | ||||
| 17. |
A “Best Practice” Lesson: Don’t Follow the Herd
When you work with senior executives and boards of directors as long as I have, troubling behaviors that directly affect corporate performance become all too clear. And a number of major corporate failures we’ve all seen in the news can be traced back to these behavioral characteristics. I’ve coined names for these bad habits. Worst is “keeping up with the Joneses” syndrome, followed by its two corollaries: “best practices” and “groupthink.”By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
04/21/09 | Columns & Editorials | ||||
| 18. |
The Simple Truth Behind the Complex Idea of Risk
Perhaps nothing in business circles today generates more heated debate than risk and risk management—not only in financial institutions, but also in every industry, and from the lowest manager level to the boardroom.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
03/24/09 | Columns & Editorials | ||||
| 19. |
Corp. Culture: Who Failed, Who Got It Right
The concept of corporate culture is difficult to get one’s arms around. We know it exists within every organization, although trying to identify or define it is challenging. That notwithstanding, executives who have been through the “wars” know well that shaping a company and its people to the desired culture plays a major role in how the organization is run and how successful it will be.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
02/18/09 | Columns & Editorials | ||||
| 20. |
Governance Challenges Facing Corporate Boards
Not long ago, I was interviewed for RiskCenter and the Global Association of Risk Professionals, where I had the opportunity to discuss a range of governance challenges faced today by boards and management. As a change of pace from my usual monthly essay, I'm going to share some of those thoughts again here in an edited version.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
01/20/09 | Columns & Editorials | ||||
| 21. |
Another Year, Another Wish List for Corporate Boards
Having developed a tradition at Compliance Week of writing a year-end column, I’m once again presenting my wish list for corporate boards of directors. The objective here is not to dream of improbable possibilities, but rather to help directors and others working with corporate boards consider where and how they can improve board performance in the coming year.By Richard M. Steinberg |
12/16/08 | Columns & Editorials | ||||
| 22. |
Risk-Management Lessons From the Credit Crisis
As the United States and the world sort through the credit crisis, and the financial markets continue to gyrate and governments craft and recraft programs in an attempt to avert disaster, one wonders what went so very wrong with those much-touted risk management systems of major financial institutions. Weren’t the big guys with the highly polished reputations supposed to have in-depth knowledge of what their risks were, and manage those risks to be profitable and sustainable? How did they, and we, end up here?By Richard M. Steinberg |
11/18/08 | Columns & Editorials | ||||
| 23. |
Brightening the Future of Our Financial Markets
We know that the regulatory structure of our financial system is about to change. As I write this column Congress continues to struggle to approve some sort of “rescue” package, with both the House and Senate reworking the first $700 billion plan that didn’t pass muster. But whatever package lawmakers ultimately pass, we can expect sometime thereafter to see an entirely new financial system-wide regulatory structure.By Richard M. Steinberg |
10/21/08 | Columns & Editorials | ||||
| 24. |
Debunking SOX Theories One Misconception at a Time
Having worked with many boards of directors, it’s clear that most directors now understand what Sarbanes-Oxley is all about. They’ve spent the last few years dealing with many of its provisions, with audit committees spending significant time on Section 404’s internal control requirements. Some initially lost sight of other important responsibilities, although generally boards have returned to a more balanced approach of providing effective advice, counsel, and direction on strategic business issues in addition to their compliance monitoring roles.By Richard M. Steinberg |
09/16/08 | Columns & Editorials | ||||
| 25. |
When Executives Discuss ERM Challenges
Recently I had the privilege of leading a forum of senior executives experienced in risk management in a discussion of the challenges of developing, implementing, and gaining the benefits of ERM.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
08/19/08 | Columns & Editorials | ||||
| 26. |
CEO Pay—Can We Get It Right?
This is the second in a two-part series on the subject of CEO pay.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
07/15/08 | Columns & Editorials | ||||
| 27. |
Tracing the Past and Future of CEO Pay
Editor’s note: This is the first in a two-part series on the subject of CEO pay.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
06/17/08 | Compliance Week Coverage | ||||
| 28. |
The Big Risk: CEOs Never See It Coming
When the fraud at Societe Generale burst into view several months ago, I analyzed what went wrong and why in “Why It’s So Shocking Societe Generale Was Shocked” (in the March 2008 edition). Well, now we see that CEO Daniel Bouton is stepping down, which comes as no surprise. He was at the helm when the SocGen ship hit an iceberg that clearly should have been seen and avoided. Management knew the company was in dangerous waters (regulators and others apprised them that damage appeared to have already been done), but did nothing to investigate and steer clear of disaster.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
05/20/08 | Columns & Editorials | ||||
| 29. |
Why Using the Right Words Really Does Matter
We all know the importance of effective communication, in both formal and informal settings, to get our messages across as intended. But how many times have we been misunderstood, or we didn’t understand an idea someone else was trying to convey? The consequences of bad communication range from simply extending a conversation to gain clarity, to talking at cross-purposes resulting in extraordinarily bad business decisions. Yes, tone of voice and body language are important in sending the right message, but using the right words is usually critical.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
04/22/08 | Columns & Editorials | ||||
| 30. |
Delivering Peace Amid Shareholder Anger
It’s extraordinarily clear that shareholders are angry! They’re angry about lots of things, from opaque or otherwise bad financial reporting to outrageous CEO compensation, poison pills, staggered boards, and anything else that emanates from the thought that boards of directors are not doing their jobs. The underlying cause, some say, is a still too-cozy relationship between the board and CEO, and directors uncaring of legitimate shareholder needs.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
03/18/08 | Columns & Editorials | ||||
| 31. |
Why It’s So Shocking Societe Generale Was Shocked
By now we’ve all seen the headline—“French Bank Rocked by Rogue Trader!”—heralding the debacle at Societe Generale as the largest bank fraud in history.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
02/20/08 | Columns & Editorials | ||||
| 32. |
How Governance Failed in the Sub-prime Mess
It’s difficult to pick up a newspaper or visit a business news Web site without encountering yet more information about the sub-prime mortgage mess—and “mess” is probably too kind a word. With the extraordinary losses and personal pain, terms like “debacle,” “fiasco,” or “disaster” are more accurate. With each new report we learn a bit more about what went wrong and the extent of the consequent suffering.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
01/23/08 | Columns & Editorials | ||||
| 33. |
What’s Coming in Governance in 2008
For several years now in my holiday season columns I’ve put forth a wish list for improvements in corporate governance. This year (again with a mug of hot chocolate in hand) I’d like to take a crack at predicting what we might see in governance in the coming years. So, as you listen to the pitter-patter of Santa’s reindeer on the roof or enjoy the light of candles fueled by miracle oil, or however you celebrate the holidays, sit back with me and ponder what the future holds.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
12/18/07 | Columns & Editorials | ||||
| 34. |
Empowering CEOs in a Shifting Landscape
My last two columns dealt with the tug of war between boards of directors and shareholders and how boards are best comprised to effectively carry out their responsibilities. Central to these issues is the relationship with the chief executive officer; specifically, how to provide the kind of oversight that enables the CEO to run the business and achieve growth and return objectives.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
11/20/07 | Columns & Editorials | ||||
| 35. |
Composing Your Board the Right Way
Last month’s column, “Tug of War Between Board and Shareholders,” focused on shareholders’ demands for greater involvement in governance, including determining who sits in the boardroom. My message was to be careful what you wish for; there’s great danger in having board composition driven by disjointed parties with self-appointed agendas.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
10/23/07 | Columns & Editorials | ||||
| 36. |
Tug of War Between Board and Shareholders
The war between boards of directors and shareholders has been raging for many years, heating up and cooling down based on success or failure, evolving goals and opportunities, and opponents’ actions. Some might not see it as a tug of war, instead viewing the respective roles of boards and shareholders as continuing to evolve and mature with the common purpose of enhancing share value. Probably both viewpoints are accurate, depending on one’s perspective and where we are at a particular point in time.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
09/18/07 | Columns & Editorials | ||||
| 37. |
The Role of Gifting in Corporate Social Responsibility
Many large (and not-so-large) companies have embraced a measure of responsibility for social needs, based in part on the premise that the corporation owes its existence to the state, or society, and consequently should be a good citizen. Few would argue with this.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
08/21/07 | Columns & Editorials | ||||
| 38. |
Being Legal, Honest, And Candid And …
As a Compliance Week reader, you know well the difference between taking an action that’s legal and one that’s ethical. “Legal,” of course, includes acting according to written laws and related regulations, as well as what is deemed legally correct by the judicial system. Acting ethically involves going beyond what is legal, focusing on principles of correct moral conduct. Much has been written about the distinction, and there are other definitions, but we need not get into further detail here.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
07/24/07 | Compliance Week Coverage | ||||
| 39. |
What Organizations Don’t Want To Know Can Hurt
Like most Compliance Week readers, I read the business press rather extensively and sometimes come across an article that piques my interest. One, the title of which I'm borrowing as the heading of this column, appeared some months ago in The New York Times.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
06/19/07 | Columns & Editorials | ||||
| 40. |
What The New Guidance Will Mean To You
Much has been written about the proposals from the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board on Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404. If you’ve been dealing with 404 implementation, you’re probably already familiar with what the proposals say, so I won‘t bore you with another recitation.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
05/22/07 | Columns & Editorials | ||||
| 41. |
Methodologies For Successfully Implementing ERM
This is the last column in the series on enterprise risk management. The first two described the “what” and “why” of ERM—what it actually is, and why companies are using it. The next two highlighted some of the more effective techniques for applying ERM and where executive responsibility for ERM best resides.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
04/17/07 | Columns & Editorials | ||||
| 42. |
Who Should Have Responsibility For ERM?
In the fourth installment of his five-part series on enterprise risk management, Rick Steinberg, the lead project partner in developing the COSO Internal Control—Integrated Framework, looks at where responsibility and accountability for ERM need to rest.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
03/20/07 | Columns & Editorials | ||||
| 43. |
Techniques To Implement ERM Successfully
In his third column on enterprise risk management, Richard Steinberg discusses some of the techniques that companies are using to get optimum benefit from their ERM processes.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
02/21/07 | Columns & Editorials | ||||
| 44. |
Why Embrace Enterprise Risk Management?
In the second installment of a series on enterprise risk management, Richard Steinberg explores the “why” of ERM—that is, why companies are moving forward with an ERM initiative, including the impetus for doing so and the benefits it brings.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
01/23/07 | Columns & Editorials | ||||
| 45. |
ERM Deconstructed: What It’s Really About
At the risk of putting the cart before the horse, let’s look at some misconceptions of ERM. The reality is that many people use the term—including board members, chief executives and other senior executives, consultants and others—all too often meaning very different things.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
12/19/06 | Columns & Editorials | ||||
| 46. |
A Holiday Wish List For Corporate Boards
Now that the holiday season again is upon us, I’d like once more to draw on my experience with boards of directors to focus on where improvements are needed. Of course, no two boards are exactly alike, and some are doing a great job. But too many still need to move to a higher level of value-added effectiveness.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
11/21/06 | Columns & Editorials | ||||
| 47. |
A Series Of Serious Mistakes At HP Board
As I write this month’s column soon after the Hewlett-Packard board fiasco became front page news, I’m enjoying the moment. Having had the privilege this morning of being featured on CNBC and Bloomberg TV, I’m now on my way to a speaking engagement on the West Coast, and will be seeing one of my sons this evening for dinner. So, with a bit of down time, and this morning’s topic fresh in my mind, now seems as good a time as any to put the fingers to the keyboard.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
10/24/06 | Columns & Editorials | ||||
| 48. |
Does Director Pay Taste Better With Coke?
Some months ago Coca-Cola announced a new pay method for its directors. I had planned to devote a column then, while it was hot news, but as other events took priority I decided it might be useful to wait a while and see what further reaction would ensue in the business community.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
09/19/06 | Columns & Editorials | ||||
| 49. |
The New COSO Guidance: Wisdom For All
COSO—the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission—recently released the long-awaited guidance for small business. It’s designed to help non-accelerated filers and other companies reduce the burdensome costs that have been or would be incurred in dealing with SOX Section 404.By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
08/22/06 | Columns & Editorials | ||||
| 50. |
And They Say 404 Simply Won’t Stop Fraud ...
While thinking about possible topics for this month’s column, an inspiration came to me out of the blue—or rather, from cyberspace. The following email appeared on my screen commenting on my July column (published June 20 electronically). By the way, I include the writer’s first two sentences only for the sake of completeness and full disclosure!By Richard M. Steinberg, Compliance Week Columnist |
07/18/06 | Columns & Editorials | ||||
| |||||||