Close

Are you in compliance?

Don't miss out! Sign up today for our weekly newsletters and stay abreast of important GRC-related information and news.

×

Status message

Start your free, no obligation 5-day trial to continue exploring with full access.

Directorial Activism In The Face Of Alleged Or Actual Officer Misbehavior

Harvey L. Pitt | March 30, 2004

Ffor at least a century, the role of non-management corporate directors was often treated as one of passivity, not activism. Power to manage a corporation's affairs was believed to reside exclusively in the hands of its senior officers, with the proper role of outside directors being generically and non-intrusively to oversee, and approve (when asked to do so), significant managerial decisions.

This misperception of an outside director's proper role was fostered by several factors:

  • Selecting outside directors was seen as a CEO perk;
  • Good corporate leaders were perceived as focused and effective, and also absolute monarchs;
  • Outside directors lacked effective resources to obtain their own guidance and assistance;
  • No...
    Read this single article for $49, or click the subscribe button below to review subscription options.

Enjoy unlimited access to thousands of articles, browse five years of digital magazines, qualify for reduced admission to events, and more.