Close

Are you in compliance?

Don't miss out! Sign up today for our weekly newsletters and stay abreast of important GRC-related information and news.

×

Status message

Start your free, no obligation 5-day trial to continue exploring with full access.

ZTE and the Arthur Andersen myth

Tom Fox | May 20, 2018

Remember the Myth of Arthur Andersen—that if you go to trial in a corruption case and lose, the company will be irreparably harmed and even destroyed. It was cited by almost every compliance practitioner, Justice Department lawyer, general counsel, and even chief executive as the reason never to go to trial in a corruption case: A loss could end your company. That myth was debunked in the book The Chickensh*t Club where Jesse Eisenger said it was a PR campaign developed by two consultants for the company. Arthur Andersen was on the verge of collapse for a whole host of business-related reasons, and the guilty verdict for destruction of documents had little or nothing to do with the company going under. 

The ZTE sanctions case, however, is a prime example of a company being forced out of business through a regulatory sanction. In April, ZTE announced it was halting operations after the U.S. Department of Commerce assessed an additional penalty above the $1.2...

Read this single article for $49, or click the subscribe button below to review subscription options.

Enjoy unlimited access to thousands of articles, browse five years of digital magazines, qualify for reduced admission to events, and more.