Close

Are you in compliance?

Don't miss out! Sign up today for our weekly newsletters and stay abreast of important GRC-related information and news.

×

Status message

Start your free, no obligation 5-day trial to continue exploring with full access.

Lawyers Fume Over EU Attorney-Client Privilege Decision

Judd Elizabeth | November 6, 2007

If in-house counsel advise their coworkers based anywhere in the European Union on a competition matter, the conversations, e-mails, and documents aren’t protected by attorney-client privilege, according to a controversial decision handed down on September 17, 2007. General counsel across Europe roundly condemned Akzo Nobel Chemicals Ltd. v. Commission, which found that attorney-client privilege in antitrust cases occurring within the 27 European Union member states can only be claimed by attorneys who’ve passed the bar in an EU country and are affiliated with a law firm.

In the U.S. and UK, where communications with in-house counsel are protected by attorney-client privilege, the decision seems particularly surprising and, to some, counterproductive. Hiring an outside law firm for all European antitrust or cartel issues is potentially quite expensive and might hamper general counsels’ ability to ensure their employers are...

Read this single article for $49, or click the subscribe button below to review subscription options.

Enjoy unlimited access to thousands of articles, browse five years of digital magazines, qualify for reduced admission to events, and more.