Compliance Week TV

In our first Compliance Week TV video we hear from Frank Diana, executive vice president of enherent Corporation, who discusses the challenges involved in information management.
Watch the video in full screen now

CPE Credits On Demand!

Subscribers can now earn FREE Continuing Professional Education (CPE) credits by watching Compliance Week Webcasts on critical topics related to corporate compliance and risk -- on demand, so at your convenience! For subscribers only.
Earn CPE for free now

Compliance Week Podcasts …

This week’s podcast features Lucy Marcus, CEO of Marcus Venture Consulting, talking about shareholder and director activism, and how corporate executives can work with them more effectively. Hear the podcast now or …

Follow Compliance Week podcasts on iTunes.

… and Compliance Week on Twitter!

You can also follow Compliance Week Editor Matt Kelly on Twitter, for the latest regulatory observations and updates. More than 2,600 followers and ranked the most influential Twitter feed on compliance!

Compliance Week LinkedIn Group

Visit the Compliance Week has a companion group on LinkedIn, where members can network and discuss the compliance and governance news of the day among themselves. Open to all, free to join.

Webcasts of the Week

Defining and Executing Systematic, Risk-Based Third-Party Due Diligence for FCPA Compliance
Sponsored by The Steele Foundation

Help Wanted: Ad of the Week

Compliance Education & Communications Mgr.
Submitted by Oracle

Event of the Week

Corporate Governance Programs
Courtesy of Harvard Business School

Thought Leadership of the Week

Access Management: Efficiency, Confidence, Control
Courtesy of SAP

The Resource Exchange

Code of Conduct
Submitted by BP

Sample Risk Acceptance Request
Submitted by Circuit City

Featured Databases

Whistleblower Guidelines
Search Whistleblower Policies, Contract Options

Class-Action Filings
Download Text of Class-Action Complaints

GRC Illustrated Series

Improving GRC by Visualizing Your Data
The 24th Installment in This Exclusive Series

Global Glimpses

RSS
Neil Baker, Compliance Week’s London correspondent, writes the Global Glimpses blog to follow corporate governance news both in Europe and around the world. Neil has written about business, particularly corporate governance, accountancy and auditing, for more than 15 years. He has also authored several booklets and research papers on corporate governance, risk management and internal auditing, and was formerly a writer for Accountancy Age. He can be reached at nbaker@complianceweek.com.

 

June 4, 2009

“Urgent Change” Needed to Fix Reporting

Corporate reporting is too complex and needs “urgent change,” according to a discussion paper from U.K. regulator the Financial Reporting Council (FRC).

The International Accounting Standards Board should overhaul its standards so each one has an easy-to-follow structure with a clear statement of what it is supposed to achieve, the FRC said.

It also called on regulators around the world to “cut the clutter” in financial reports by easing back on the volume of disclosure they require. And it said companies themselves could make their disclosures more understandable by remembering that “immaterial disclosures undermine the quality of reports.”

The FRC said it will review a selection of 2008 annual reports from U.K.-listed companies over the summer and publish a paper showing how regulation had caused clutter. The executives it spoke to when researching its paper “almost unanimously said the process of compiling a report is too complex, and so are the reports themselves,” it added.

The paper, “Louder than Words: Principles and Actions for Making Corporate Reports Less Complex and More Relevant,” recommends what the FRC calls “a commonsense approach to reducing complexity.” It sets out eight guiding principles, four for better communication in reports and four for improving the quality and effectiveness of regulations.

Ian Wright, the FRC’s Director of Corporate Reporting, said: “The FRC and many others agree that regulations themselves should be principles or outcomes based. So shouldn’t those setting the regulations and standards also do so within a principles-based framework?”

The paper is also available for download in short and long versions.

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment