Compliance Week Podcasts …

This week’s podcast features Russ Berland of the law firm Stinson Morrison & Hecker talking about how to use new guidance from the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development as a blueprint for better FCPA compliance programs. Hear the podcast now.

… and Compliance Week on Twitter!

You can also follow Compliance Week Editor Matt Kelly on Twitter, for the latest regulatory observations and updates. More than 2,100 followers and ranked the most influential Twitter feed on compliance!

Compliance Week LinkedIn Group

Visit the Compliance Week has a companion group on LinkedIn, where members can network and discuss the compliance and governance news of the day among themselves. Open to all, free to join.

Webcast of the Week

Risk Oversight and the New SEC Rule
Sponsored by OpenPages

Help Wanted: Ad of the Week

Compliance Counsel
Submitted by Midwest ISO

Event of the Week

International Tax Legislative Update
Sponsored by Vertex

Thought Leadership of the Week

ERM in the Aftermath of the Credit Crisis
Courtesy of Crowe Horwath

The Resource Exchange

Sample Risk Acceptance Request
Submitted by Circuit City

Risk Inventory
Submitted by Cognizant Technology

Featured Databases

CEO, CFO Disclosure Certifications
CEO, CFO Certifications From 3,000 Cos.

Management Discussion & Analysis
Compare How Peers Disclose Risk

GRC Illustrated Series

The IFRS Ripple Effect
The 23rd Installment in This Exclusive Series

Compensation Survey

Compliance, Audit & Risk Compensation Survey
Empsight’s 2010 Compensation Survey is now open for participation. It is the leading source of its kind and reports on Fortune 500 and other large multinationals.

Global Integrity Survey

2009 Global Integrity Survey
Download the findings of the 2009 Global Integrity Survey, compiled by Compliance Week and sponsored by Integrity Interactive.

Enforcement Action

RSS
“Enforcement Action” is written by Bruce Carton, a former senior counsel in the SEC's Division of Enforcement. A “blawg pioneer” (according to The Wall Street Journal), Carton was the creator of Securities Litigation Watch, a blog that he wrote for more than three years while he was vice president of ISS' Securities Class Action Services. He is now editor of Securities Docket, an online publication that tracks securities litigation and enforcement developments on a global basis. Carton welcomes questions, comments and statements from readers on enforcement and litigation issues; he can be reached via email at BCarton@complianceweek.com.

 

December 14, 2008

Investigation Nation: The Pequot Insider Trading Case That Won’t End

In the summer of 2001, General Electric (GE) acquired Heller Financial.  Before the deal was publicly announced, Pequot Capital Management Arthur Samberg directed the purchase of “a little over a million shares” of Heller Financial stock and also directed Pequot to short shares of GE during the same time period. Just after the acquisition was announced, Samberg sold the Heller stock and covered the GE short position, resulting in approximately $18 million in profits over a period of a few weeks.

These trades set in motion an SEC insider trading investigation in 2003, but also a series of related, follow-on investigations that has grown to be truly beyond belief and which continues to this day.  In short, these trades have so far led to:

  • an investigation by the SEC’s Division of Enforcement.
  • an investigation by the SEC’s Inspector General of the investigation by the SEC’s Division of Enforcement.
  • an investigation and 108-page report by the Senate Finance and Judiciary Committees of the investigation by the SEC’s Inspector General of the investigation by the SEC’s Division of Enforcement.
  • a complete re-investigation and 191-page report by the SEC’s Inspector General of the investigation by the SEC’s Division of Enforcement.
  • a brief “re-re-investigation” and 15-page report by an SEC Initiating Official of the SEC’s Inspector General’s disciplinary recommendations flowing from his re-investigation of the investigation by the SEC’s Division of Enforcement.
  • a new investigation commenced in December 2008 by the Senate Finance and Judiciary Committees of reported new evidence emerging in the Pequot insider trading matter.
  • an FBI investigation commenced in December 2008 based on the reported new evidence.

The excruciating chronology and details of these investigations are as follows:

November 2003: SEC’s Division of Enforcement opens informal inquiry into potential securities law violations by Pequot Capital Management,

September 2004: New SEC employee Gary Aguirre assigned to case.

January 2005: SEC issues formal order of investigation, issues subpoenas for documents and witness testimony.  Individual Pequot employees represented by six different law firms.

March 2005.  SEC issues a second subpoena for documents; “among over 90 that the SEC issued in the Pequot investigation.”

April-May 2005: Pequot begins producing approximately 80,000 electronic records and 300,000 pages per week to SEC, until a discovery dispute waylays production.

September 1, 2005: Aguirre fired.

October 2005: SEC’s Inspector General Walter Stachnik opens initial investigation regarding Aguirre’s claims that John Mack, CEO of Morgan Stanley, given preferential treatment in Pequot investigation.

November 2005: After interviewing six SEC employees, Stachnik investigation closed.

April 2006: Senate Finance and Judiciary Committees commence investigation into Aguirre’s allegations of lax enforcement in Pequot case.  Senate committees hold three separate hearings related to these matters in June, September and December 2006.  In addition, Senate Finance and Judiciary Committees interview and/or take testimony of at least 14 separate individuals.

July 2006: SEC’s Inspector General Stachnik reopens his investigation of alleged irregularities in Pequot investigation at request of Chairman Cox.

November 30, 2006. SEC’s Division of Enforcement closes its Pequot investigation, takes no action.

August 2007: Senate Finance and Judiciary Committees issue 108-page final report (with additional 599 pages of exhibits) finding that SEC’s IG Stachnik failed to conduct a serious, credible investigation of Aguirre’s claims.

August 2007: SEC IG Stachnik resigns.

December 2007: H. David Kotz named new SEC IG,

January 2008: Kotz personally takes over re-investigation of Aguirre/Pequot matter.  In connection with re-investigation, Kotz and his office:

  • take Aguirre’s testimony on five seprate occasions and had telephone discussions with Aguirre on at least 13 other occasions
  • interview 28 individuals with knowledge of Aguirre/Pequot matter
  • take sworn testimony of 26 individuals
  • review countless documents and emails from all key individuals

October 2008: IG Kotz issues 191-page report finding that there is evidence “rais[ing] serious questions about the impartiality and fairness” of the SEC’s investigation of possible insider trading at Pequot Capital Management, recommends disciplinary action against Enforcement officials.

November 2008: Initiating Official Brenda Murray, re-opens record, re-examines facts and solicits new statements from SEC Enforcement officials.  She then issues a 15-page report rejecting IG Kotz’s recommendations of discipline, and finds record does not support any disciplinary or performance-action.

December 2008: New evidence emerges that Pequot secretly began to pay $2.1 million to a key witness in the case in 2007. Senate Finance and Judiciary Committees asks Pequot’s chairman to provide records related to the payments, and the FBI is now reportedly looking into the matter.

Will this case and its investigations of investigations of investigations ever end?

Posted by: bcarton @ 2:42 pm

Filed under: Uncategorized

2 »

  1. Bruce -

    Should it end?

    Covering both sides of the GE/Heller deal looks very bad. The SEC mis-handled the investigation. Which is worse?

    Comment by Doug Cornelius — December 15, 2008 @ 11:09 am

  2. Pequot is also a defendant in a civil case involving alleged trading on non-public information. The details of the emails between parties are available at http://www.deepcapture.com

    The SEC folks did not look very credible in the Senate hearings. The IG refused to answer. The SEC demanded information from Aquirre that he was giving the Senate. They tried to stop him from giving the information to the Judiciary Committee. This whole thing smacks of intimidation, obstruction, and special favors for those who are being regulated.

    Comment by mhelburn — January 9, 2009 @ 2:33 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment