Taking the pulse of third-party risk management policies
This e-Book, produced by Compliance Week, explores the latest trends in third-party risk management programs against which compliance officers and risk officers can gauge how their programs compare against their peers. This eBook further examines best practices for how to reduce the associated costs of managing third-party risk.
THIS IS MEMBERS-ONLY CONTENT
You are not logged in and do not have access to members-only content.
If you are already a registered user or a member, SIGN IN now.
Related articles
-
Article
Best practices in third-party risk management
NAVEX Global’s fourth annual third-party risk management benchmark report offers risk and compliance officers a glimpse at how their third-party risk management programs stack up against their peers.
-
OpinionTime to end 'desktop compliance' in public procurement in Latin America
Global corporate compliance has reached an inflection point. For years, multinational corporations have based their Third-Party Risk Management programs in Latin America on standardized questionnaires and certificates issued by local governments.
-
OpinionThe third party you forgot to vet: AI tools and the TPRM blind spot in manufacturing
AI tools are arriving through the back door of enterprise software — no contract, no due diligence, no TPRM trigger — and most manufacturing compliance functions have no idea they are already inside.
More from e-Books
-
Resourcee-Book: Staying Ahead: Modern strategies for third-party risk in a disrupted world
This e-Book compiles expert insights and real-world examples, offering practical guidance for compliance professionals navigating todayʼs complex landscape.
-
Resourcee-Book: Tackling Third Party Risk In A Global World
TPRM has always been a tough subject, requiring regular monitoring and audits to be done right. But until recently, it was something companies chose to do.
-
Resourcee-Book: The growing support for whistleblowers
New whistleblower award programs are in the works at U.S. agencies including the Department of Justice and Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, while key regulators in the United Kingdom have also expressed support for compensating individuals.