KPMG Japan fined $500K over journal entry quality controls
By 
Kyle Brasseur2023-11-15T22:18:00
The Japanese affiliate of Big Four audit firm KPMG was assessed a $500,000 penalty by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) for quality control deficiencies regarding journal entry testing.
KPMG Japan must review and evaluate its policies and procedures concerning journal entry testing after the PCAOB found the firm’s policies insufficient to provide reasonable assurance its auditors were conducting testing in line with applicable standards, the regulator said in a press release Wednesday.
The firm’s violations occurred from 2019-21, the PCAOB said in its order. During that time, the regulator found KPMG Japan’s system of quality control failed to include adequate monitoring procedures to ensure effective journal entry testing.
THIS IS MEMBERS-ONLY CONTENT
You are not logged in and do not have access to members-only content.
If you are already a registered user or a member, SIGN IN now.
Related articles
-
News BriefPCAOB fines KPMG units $3.4M, PwC Singapore $1.5M for audit, independence violations
Nine affiliates of KPMG agreed to pay a total of nearly $3.4 million for alleged violations of audit and quality control standards, while PwC Singapore will pay $1.5 million to settle separate allegation that the firm manipulated independence compliance reporting.
-
News BriefKPMG fined $1.9M by FRC over M&C Saatchi audit lapses
KPMG agreed to pay a reduced penalty of nearly £1.5 million (U.S. $1.9 million) assessed by the U.K. Financial Reporting Council addressing admitted failings in the Big Four audit firm’s financial year 2018 work at advertising services company M&C Saatchi.
-
News BriefPwC Greece fined $3M for due care, skepticism failures
The Greece-based branch of Big Four audit firm PwC agreed to pay $3 million as part of a settlement with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board addressing alleged failures in due professional care and appropriate skepticism regarding an audit of a marine fuel logistics company.
More from Regulatory Enforcement
-
ArticleU.K. competition regulator ‘very likely’ to use new enforcement powers despite government’s pro-growth agenda
New powers granted to the U.K.’s main competition watchdog will result in greater scrutiny, tougher enforcement, and a stark warning for companies to review their sales and marketing promotions—especially since some practices have been pushed firmly into the spotlight thanks to legislation that came into effect last year.
-
ArticleSEC enforcement priorities revert back to basics
Recent pronouncements made by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission leadership, alongside the recent overhaul of the SEC Enforcement Manual, collectively signal a back-to-basics enforcement approach that appears beneficial for companies in their dealings with the agency.
-
ArticleFCA drive to reduce its investigation costs likely to add to compliance burden for smaller firms, warn experts
The U.K. financial regulator’s move towards “impactful deterrence” could see smaller and mid-size firms come increasingly under the spotlight as the watchdog aims to tackle market-wide concerns instead of primarily focusing on large players capable of doing the most harm.