Court delays enforcement of CCPA changes to March 2024
By 
Kyle Brasseur2023-07-05T14:03:00
Changes to the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) expected to take effect July 1 have been stayed until March 2024 following a ruling from the Sacramento County Superior Court.
On Friday, the court determined the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) did not adopt final regulations in a timely manner as required under the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA). The CPRA called for changes to the CCPA to be adopted by July 1, 2022; the agency in March announced the final rules.
In disagreement with the CPPA, the court ruled the CPRA as approved by California voters called for a 12-month grace period between the agency’s adoption of final regulations and their enforcement.
Related articles
-
News BriefCCPA first state privacy law deemed adequate by Dubai financial hub
The Dubai International Financial Centre announced the California Consumer Privacy Act passes muster, allowing compliant California businesses to be the first permitted to transfer data with the DIFC without additional contractual measures.
-
PremiumCalifornia privacy reg delay offers little more than short reprieve
Many businesses are breathing a sigh of relief following a court ruling that delayed enforcement of certain provisions of the California Privacy Rights Act, but companies should not rest on their laurels, according to experts.
-
News BriefIndiana privacy bill signed into law; effective 2026
Indiana became the latest in a growing number of U.S. states with a comprehensive consumer data privacy law on the books.
More from Regulatory Policy
-
News BriefSEC’s Crypto Task Force hits the road with nationwide roundtables
The Securities and Exchange Commission is taking its pro-crypto messaging on the road, planning a series of events for its Crypto Task Force that will be held across the U.S. starting on Aug. 4.
-
Basic PageDOJ warns against using proxies for DEI in federally funded programs
The DOJ is warning that simply scrubbing DEI-related words from policy documents or training materials—and replacing them with thinly veiled proxies—will not protect federally funded organizations from legal scrutiny.
-
ArticleU.K. proposes streamlining regime meant to hold fin serve executives to account
When growth slows, governments often cut rules to attract investment, as the U.K. has in its financial services sector, which contributes 8.8% of GDP, but easing the “compliance burden” raises concerns about oversight, governance, and prioritizing profits over safety.