CPE Webcast: Techniques for more effective forced labor risk identification in supply chains
Provided by 
Sayari
By requiring U.S. importers to prove that their supply chains are free of forced labor, the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) has created heightened nationwide demand for sophisticated supply chain mapping and risk identification capabilities.
Related articles
-
News BriefChinese steel, artificial sweetener from Xinjiang now banned under UFLPA
Steel and an artificial sweetener made by two Chinese companies using forced labor have been banned from entering the U.S. under the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act.
-
PremiumUpdated UFLPA enforcement strategy targets aluminum, PVC, seafood imports
U.S. Customs and Border Protection will make it a priority to check shipments of aluminum, polyvinyl chloride, and seafood from China and elsewhere in the region for links to forced labor, according to an updated Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act enforcement strategy.
-
WebcastAug 7 | No Longer Optional: The Future of AI in TPRM
Don’t miss this opportunity to prepare your organization for the future of TPRM and stay ahead with AI as your second-in-command.
More from Webcasts
-
WebcastAug 19 | Navigating Evolving Regulations: Key Insights for Compliance Leaders
This webinar tackles the current legal landscape head-on, giving compliance officers a practical lens on the latest developments impacting your oversight responsibilities.
-
WebcastAug 21 | Banking Compliance in 2025: Key Trends and Future-Proofing Strategies
In addition to a loosening of traditional banking regulation and supervision in areas like capital requirements, stress testing and liquidity, U.S. banking regulators have indicated they will be more receptive to innovation than the previous administration, particularly in the use of Artificial Intelligence, and in digital assets.
-
WebcastAug 26 | Risky Business: Navigating Compliant Innovation Amid Deregulation
The compliance landscape has entered unprecedented territory, characterized by what industry experts describe as “deregulation on top of deregulation” – a dangerous departure from the traditional regulatory cycle that historically provided stability and clear guidance.