Paul B. W. Miller and Paul R. Bahnson

Over the last six years or so, starting long before the current search for accounting reform, the two of us have gone through the process of changing the way we look at public financial reporting. Mind you, we didn’t just tweak our perspective but completely changed our views on the objectives and methods of financial […]

PART FIVE IN A SERIES Over the last month, we have had the opportunity to describe in these pages the basics of Quality Financial Reporting. QFR is our proposed alternative to management’s current dependence on compliance with generally accepted accounting principles to produce fully informed capital markets. Whereas the status quo paradigm looks for ways […]

PART FOUR IN A SERIES In the preceding three columns, we described the Quality Financial Reporting paradigm. It is an attitude, not a set of procedures. By adopting a QFR strategy, management tries to build positive and lasting partnership relationships with capital markets that lead to lower capital costs and higher stock prices. QFR is […]

PART TWO IN A SERIES Last week, we began a series on the new mindset that we call “Quality Financial Reporting.” At the heart of QFR is the axiomatic proof that voluntarily reporting more complete and useful information will reduce uncertainty and risk for financial statement users, and lead to lower capital costs and higher […]

PART THREE IN A SERIES In the last two columns, we introduced the paradigm-changing strategy of Quality Financial Reporting that involves a whole new attitude toward providing financial information to the capital markets. While traditional thinking causes management to be satisfied with providing the least amount of information allowable under GAAP and SEC regulations as […]