In 2016, the question of what was meant by the term in the FCPA โ€œanything of valueโ€ was soundly settled. From the February VimpelCom resolution to the โ€œSons and Daughtersโ€ hiring cases of Qualcomm and JPMorgan Chase, regulators pushed the meaning of the term โ€œanything of valueโ€ to literally just that: โ€œanything.โ€ In VimpelCom, the SEC alleged that the company violated the FCPAโ€™s anti-bribery provisions by donating approximately $500,000 to the foreign officialโ€™s charities, even if none of the money benefited the foreign official ,who otherwise received remuneration. There was no evidence, however,  this benefited the foreign official involved.

Thomas Fox has practiced law for over 40 years. Tom writes the daily award-winning blog, the FCPA Compliance and Ethics blog and founded the Compliance Podcast Network. Tom leads the discussion on AI in...