Activision Blizzard scandal signals day of reckoning for video game industry
By 
Jaclyn Jaeger2021-08-03T17:34:00
Activision Blizzard is not only a case study in how not to respond to allegations of sexual harassment and discrimination in the workplace—it’s also the latest blatant showing of managerial recklessness in an industry ripe for transformational change.
Related articles
-
News BriefActivision Blizzard fined $35M by SEC over workplace harassment disclosures
Activision Blizzard will pay $35 million to resolve Securities and Exchange Commission charges it violated federal securities laws by failing to adequately disclose how its ineffective response to workplace complaints was harming its ability to hire and retain skilled employees.
-
ArticleRiot Games to pay $100M in gender discrimination lawsuit settlement
Video game developer Riot Games has agreed to pay more than $100 million as part of a settlement in California resolving allegations of sex discrimination against female workers and harassment.
-
ArticleActivision Blizzard case study: When CCOs become the CEO’s mouthpiece
Many chief compliance officers report directly to the board or chief executive officer. But what happens to the CCO when the CEO is the problem? Take Activision Blizzard as an example of what not to do.
More from Opinion
-
OpinionHow to make the business case to upgrade records management systems
Companies are giving their records management programs a makeover, and not for the reasons you may think. What used to be a sleepy back-office legal department function is now front and center, often driven by compliance teams. Organizations are discovering that a “save everything, forever” de facto policy doesn’t ...
-
OpinionWhy the EU’s new Machinery Regulation is a wake-up call on cybersecurity
The European manufacturing industry is on the cusp of a regulatory shift that promises to reshape how machines are designed and operated.
-
OpinionWrite supply chain resilience into the contract
The only thing constant is change. Shouldn’t we be ready for that in our contracts?