By Jeff Dale2024-02-20T20:29:00
JPMorgan Chase disclosed in a regulatory filing it expects to be penalized approximately $350 million by two unnamed U.S. regulators over lapses in its trading surveillance activities.
The firm self-identified “certain trading and order data through the CIB (corporate and investment bank) was not feeding into its trade surveillance platforms,” according to JPMorgan’s latest annual report filed Friday.
As part of an internal investigation, the firm said it nearly completed reviewing data not originally surveilled and, so far, has “not identified any employee misconduct, harm to clients, or the market.”
2024-03-14T19:01:00Z By Aaron Nicodemus
JPMorgan Chase will pay $348.2 million in fines to settle allegations laid by two federal banking regulators that it failed to adequately monitor trading and order activity.
2024-02-07T21:06:00Z By Aaron Nicodemus
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority fined Goldman Sachs $512,500 for allegedly failing to properly surveil certain types of securities for potential manipulative trading activity for more than a decade.
2024-01-16T15:51:00Z By Aaron Nicodemus
A subsidiary of JPMorgan Chase will pay an $18 million fine to the Securities and Exchange Commission for allegedly violating the agency’s whistleblower protection rule in hundreds of settlement agreements with clients and customers.
2025-10-08T18:28:00Z By Adrianne Appel
Charlie Javice, a former CEO who duped JPMorgan Chase into purchasing her start up company for $175 million, has been ordered to forfeit more than $22 million by the Department of Justice (DOJ) and to spend 7 years in jail.
2025-10-07T16:08:00Z By Adrianne Appel
Georgia Tech Research Corp. (GTRC) has agreed to pay $875,000 to settle allegations first raised by two compliance officers that its cybersecurity protocols violated acceptable standards for defense contractors, the Department of Justice (DOJ) said.
2025-10-06T17:12:00Z By Adrianne Appel
Tractor Supply Company has agreed to get into compliance with California’s consumer privacy law and to pay a $1.35 million fine—the largest yet by California—to settle allegations it violated the privacy rights of customers and job applicants.
Site powered by Webvision Cloud