SEC crackdown on whistleblower violations a warning on employment contracts
By 
Aaron Nicodemus2023-10-31T12:55:00
What should your company be doing in response to increased enforcement emphasis by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regarding violations of its whistleblower protection rule?
Problematic and prohibited wording can exist in nondisclosure agreements, confidentiality agreements, employee onboarding agreements, voluntary or involuntary termination agreements, and in severance documents that an employee must sign to receive compensation or payments, among other documentation.
Consider the recent enforcement case against investment firm D.E. Shaw & Co., which agreed to pay a $10 million fine in September to settle charges it included prohibited clauses in certain types of employment agreements. The penalty was the largest ever assessed against a company for violating the whistleblower rule (Rule 21F-17), remarked SEC Enforcement Director Gurbir Grewal.
Related articles
-
News BriefJPMorgan to pay record $18M for violating SEC whistleblower rule
A subsidiary of JPMorgan Chase will pay an $18 million fine to the Securities and Exchange Commission for allegedly violating the agency’s whistleblower protection rule in hundreds of settlement agreements with clients and customers.
-
PremiumCompanies must set clear tone under EU whistleblower rules
With a moving target for compliance under the EU’s Whistleblower Directive, the opportunity exists for companies to set their own standards on whistleblowing and engender greater trust among employees, according to a panel at Compliance Week’s Europe conference in London.
-
News BriefCFTC: ‘Majority’ of FY23 whistleblower cases related to crypto fraud
Most of the whistleblower tips received by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission in fiscal year 2023 related to fraud and misappropriation of crypto/digital assets.
More from Regulatory Enforcement
-
News BriefCFPB scraps bad-actor registry, citing cost-benefit issues
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau shut down a registry of non-bank financial firms that broke consumer laws. The agency cites the costs being ”not justified by the speculative and unquantified benefits to consumers.”
-
ArticleSenate Democrats question Vought on comments about closing CFPB in months
Senate Democrats warned OMB Director Russell Vought Tuesday that it would be illegal for the Trump administration to shut down the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, citing a recent court decision barring actions that could severely harm the agency.
-
PremiumAssessing the impact of the DOJ’s monitorship policy six months in
It has been nearly six months now since the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) Criminal Division released its memorandum on the selection of compliance monitors. This article provides a critical analysis of the monitorships that received early terminations, those that remain in place, and the broader compliance lessons they impart.