New regulatory regimes for U.K. and EU ESG ratings firms could increase compliance costs
By 
Ruth Prickett2025-11-28T17:04:00
Environmental ratings are becoming big business as companies seek proof of sustainable and socially beneficial conduct, both to avoid accusations of greenwashing and convince investors and customers they have enduring value. Firms that issue ratings on environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance are set to be regulated in the EU and U.K.
THIS IS MEMBERS-ONLY CONTENT
You are not logged in and do not have access to members-only content.
If you are already a registered user or a member, SIGN IN now.
Related articles
-
ArticleHow to prepare for U.K. sustainability reporting rules
The U.K.’s plans to revise how companies report more meaningfully on the impact their operations have on the environment will mean organizations will have to dig for better data to satisfy regulators—even if they decide that compliance with the proposed rules is not appropriate for them under the option of ...
-
ArticleEU and U.K. demand evidence to back sustainability claims
Businesses must come clean about green. The U.K. and the EU are enhancing and clarifying rules around corporate sustainability claims, with supply chains in their sights.
-
OpinionWhat to know about double materiality assessments for ESG initiatives
Double materiality assessments help organizations identify and prioritise ESG topics that matter most, both in terms of their impact on society and the environment, and their financial implications for the business.
More from Regulatory Policy
-
ArticleNew DOJ fraud division means broad realignment of resources and attorneys
A new Department of Justice (DOJ) division will lead investigations of government fraud, and take over duties—and staff, and funds– currently handled by other DOJ divisions and government agencies, Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche announced.
-
PremiumHong Kong wants to know if your bank has a culture problem
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority’s Bank Culture Reform program is in its eighth year. Phase 2 of its misconduct-sharing scheme covers more than 50,000 banking professionals. The shift signals regulators are evaluating whether culture works, not just prescribing rules.
-
NewsFinCEN proposes overhaul of AML rules, ending 2024 risk assessment requirements
A rule overhaul proposed by the U.S. Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network is designed to reduce compliance burden, which would free up banks from tracking all but the most egregious illicit financial activities.