This monthโs indictment of two former executives of Bristol-Myers Squibb highlights the governmentโs increasing use of โdeferred prosecution agreements,โ under which companies insulate themselves from criminal liability by agreeing to assist in the prosecution of employees. On the same day that federal prosecutors announced that they were pursuing ex-CFO Frederick Schiff and Richard Lane, who […]
Regulatory Enforcement
Mirant Lawsuit Could Make Southern Co. Liable For Debts
Mirant Corp. and its creditors committee have filed a lawsuit against its former parent, Southern Co., asserting, in effect, that the Atlanta-based holding company played a role in Mirantโs bankruptcy due to the way it structured the spin-off of Mirant in April 2001. The plaintiffs are seeking to recover at least $2 billion in connection […]
Court: SOX May Give Life To โLate Filedโ Securities Suit
Asecurities fraud suit might be able to go forward under Sarbanes-Oxley even though it clearly would have been barred under the pre-SOX law, a federal appellate court has ruled. The decision could potentially open the courthouse doors to many securities lawsuits presumed dead. Several appellate courts have held in recent months that SOXโwhich expanded the […]
Wal-Mart Subject Of Another Whistleblower Complaint
Wal-Mart Stores is the subject of a whistleblower complaint for the second time in three weeks. A complaint filed Friday with the U.S. Labor Department asserts that Rickey Armstrong, a quality auditor in Wal-Martโs Dallas Optical Laboratory, was fired by the retailing giant on March 12 in violation of Section 806 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act […]
Corporate Lawyers On Andersen Ruling: A Sigh Of Relief
Corporate attorneys breathed a sigh of relief last week when the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously overturned the conviction of Arthur Andersen; the court ruled that the jury was wrongly told that the former accounting giant could be convicted even if it never intended to do anything unlawful. Andersen was convicted of witness-tampering for conduct that […]
Corporate Lawyers On Andersen Ruling: A Sigh Of Relief
Corporate attorneys breathed a sigh of relief last week when the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously overturned the conviction of Arthur Andersen; the court ruled that the jury was wrongly told that the former accounting giant could be convicted even if it never intended to do anything unlawful. Andersen was convicted of witness-tampering for conduct that […]
What D&Os Should Know About SEC Fraud Investigations
As an officer or director of a public company, there are few things that will impact your professional life more profoundly than an investigation by the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commissionโs Division of Enforcement. As an SEC investigation is launched, it is critical that you do not become lost among the frenzy of external and […]
Tyson Case Reminds Companies To Disclose Perks
When the Securities and Exchange Commission recently settled charges against Tyson Foods and its former chairman and CEO Donald Tysonโstemming from $3 million in perquisites and personal benefits paid out to Tyson and other family membersโit marked the second case related to how companies dole out perks, and how they disclose them to investors. The […]
Court: Detailed Disclosure Optional If Control Not At Issue
An individual who acquires more than 5 percent of a companyโs stock canโt be sued for failing to file a detailed disclosure form with the Securities and Exchange Commission, a federal appeals court has ruled, finding that such disclosure is only required when there is a tender offer or an accumulation of stock that affects […]
โWeโre All In Troubleโ; Why The Andersen Case Matters
The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments last week in the criminal prosecution of Arthur Andersenโa case which many see as an example of prosecutorial zeal that leaves companies in the dark about whether actions that are common practice today might be seen as unlawful tomorrow. Andersen was convicted of witness tampering for conduct that took […]


