Posted inBoards & Shareholders

TPRM Keynote speaker Cherepanova says directors don’t need specialization, they need critical thinking

Regulators and investors increasingly say boards of directors need more expertise to ensure they can respond to fast-changing politics, policy, and technology that threaten to undermine their businesses. In the U.K., government officials say boards need to think more about cyber. In the EU, they need to prepare for the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). Speaking at Compliance Week’s Third-Party Risk Management summit, Boards of the Future director Vera Cherepanova says that directors need to think broadly, rather than in specialties.

Posted inRisk Management

Google’s $500 million compliance overhaul could fall short of best practices, amid antitrust fallout

Google parent Alphabet has struck a new agreement with shareholders, settling a shareholder lawsuit with a promise to ”completely revamp and rebuild its global compliance structure,” according to a new legal filing. The investment may not go far enough to reform Alphabet’s compliance failings, which are particularly under scrutiny following two antitrust rulings in two different cases against the company over the past year.

Posted inEthics & Culture

Directors should be more accountable for failure, while also taking more risks, says U.K. regulator

Director accountability is back in the spotlight in the U.K., even as the government pushes for regulatory simplification to cut red tape and drive growth. This raises questions about how boards can be encouraged to take risks to grow their businesses while also being held more accountable for governance failings. As regulators and auditors debate where the line between accountability and ambition should fall, what should compliance managers be advising boards, and what changes are already in progress?

Gift this article