News and analysis for the well-informed compliance or audit exec.
Annual Membership best value
Subscribe now for $365
Our lowest price ($1 per day) for one year.
Register for free
Receive the CW newsletter and access CPE webcasts.
- Chief Compliance Officer and VP of Legal Affairs, Arrow Electronics
By Neil Hodge2024-02-07T18:03:00
The decision by France’s data regulator to fine an Amazon warehouse manager for breaches of the European Union’s privacy law over the way the company monitored employee productivity raises questions about the reach data protection authorities (DPA) have over corporate conduct—and whether they can cope with a possible increase in demand.
On Jan. 23, the CNIL announced it fined Amazon France Logistique 32 million euros (then-U.S. $35 million) over the way it tracked employees as they worked. The regulator’s main concerns were that Amazon’s use of tracking technologies and collection and retention of data was excessive and that other, less intrusive methods could have been used instead.
The CNIL also found employees were not properly informed about the extent of the monitoring until 2020—nearly two years after the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) came into force. It noted that by breaking the law and squeezing workers to work harder and faster, Amazon could have secured an unfair advantage over its rivals.
THIS IS MEMBERS-ONLY CONTENT. To continue reading, choose one of the options below.
News and analysis for the well-informed compliance or audit exec.
Annual Membership best value
Subscribe now for $365
Our lowest price ($1 per day) for one year.
Register for free
Receive the CW newsletter and access CPE webcasts.
2024-02-09T20:03:00Z By Neil Hodge
The French data regulator’s fine against an Amazon warehouse manager for violating employees’ rights to privacy in the workplace once again raises questions about what constitutes an overzealous approach to employee monitoring and why companies fail to recognize the signs.
2024-01-24T03:50:00Z By Kyle Brasseur
Amazon’s warehouse management arm in France was assessed a penalty of €32 million (U.S. $35 million) for violating the General Data Protection Regulation by excessively tracking the productivity of employees.
2021-08-11T18:23:00Z By Neil Hodge
Recent fines in Italy against two food delivery companies for violating the privacy of their drivers should act as a warning that employee surveillance can prove to be a major breach of the General Data Protection Regulation.
2024-07-26T12:54:00Z By Adrianne Appel
Michael Macko, deputy director of enforcement at the California Privacy Protection Agency, described priorities for the agency now and in the near future during a recent board meeting.
2024-07-24T13:19:00Z By Adrianne Appel
Eight large companies, including Mastercard and JPMorgan Chase, have been ordered by the Federal Trade Commission to provide detailed reports about their possibly secret use of artificial intelligence to track customers and use the information to set prices.
2024-06-24T21:02:00Z By Jeff Dale
Facial recognition company Clearview AI reached a preliminary settlement in a class action lawsuit alleging it violated the Illinois Biometric Privacy Act, with the company agreeing to compensate victims with stake in the company.
Site powered by Webvision Cloud