What 2025’s AI mishaps should teach compliance in 2026
By 
Ruth Prickett2025-12-29T12:00:00
If 2025 was the year generative AI took off in organizations in every sector, it was also the year we saw increasing examples of the risks of AI mishaps. In 2026, AI is likely to move further into every part of our businesses – particularly with the development of digital agents. It pays, therefore, to look at what can go wrong and what compliance can do.
Given that many organizations are still developing the ways they use AI, past cases provide only some indication of potential risks. New threats are emerging constantly. For example, on Nov. 18, The Guardian reported that consumer magazine Which had warned that AI chatbots were giving inaccurate advice on finance.
THIS IS MEMBERS-ONLY CONTENT
You are not logged in and do not have access to members-only content.
If you are already a registered user or a member, SIGN IN now.
Related articles
-
ArticleFINRA executive explains regulator’s use of AI at Compliance Week event
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has welcomed artificial intelligence (AI) with open arms—and also caution.
-
OpinionThe illusion of control: How shrinking teams and AI are redefining cyber risk
Over recent years, cybersecurity executives have been tasked with an almost impossible Challenge: reduce headcount, accelerate transformation, integrate artificial intelligence, meet regulatory obligations, and still maintain resilience.
-
OpinionSOX was built for humans. AI doesn’t fit that model.
For more than two decades, assurance and compliance frameworks have rested on a simple assumption: Material decisions are made by people. Post‑Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) assurance reset worked because it aligned accountability with human behavior. That assumption shapes how internal controls are designed, how accountability is assigned, and how assurance is ...
More from Opinion
-
ArticleGSA’s draft AI Clause turns governance into a contractual mandate
A sweeping proposed federal procurement clause would push AI oversight out of policy decks and into compliance operations, vendor management, and real-time control testing.
-
OpinionFrom enforcer to coach: Engineering compliance that happens at speed
New Gartner research reveals why traditional risk management is failing to keep pace with modern risks, and outlines how compliance leaders must enable organizational risk owners to build an instinctive Risk Reflex.
-
OpinionLeveraging COSO to mitigate AI risk: A step-by-step guide
AI elevates compliance, or exposes it. The technology presents compliance leaders and lawyers with an extraordinary opportunity to elevate their roles, as well as an equally extraordinary risk of accountability when AI fails, misleads, discriminates, hallucinates, or generates unreliable outputs.