DOJ wants less monitoring, more self-disclosure and fine reductions, Galeotti says
The Criminal Division of the Department of Justice (DOJ), continuing its aggressive, pro-business stance, has revamped key, white-collar crime enforcement policies, including clarifying fine reductions in its self-disclosure program and curbing its use of monitorships, Matthew Galeotti, head of DOJ’s criminal division, announced on Monday.
The DOJ is also reviewing its corporate whistle-blower awards program to bring it more in line with the priorities of the current administration, Galeotti said during the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association’s Anti-Money Laundering and Financial Crimes program, in Washington, D.C.
THIS IS MEMBERS-ONLY CONTENT
You are not logged in and do not have access to members-only content.
If you are already a registered user or a member, SIGN IN now.
Related articles
-
ArticleFinCEN cuts off 10 Mexican casinos from U.S. financial system for laundering cartel drug money
Ten Mexican cartels will be severed from the U.S. financial system for laundering money for the Sinaloa Cartel criminal organization, according to the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN).
-
PremiumQ&A with former FCPA Unit chief Charles Duross on the DOJ’s monitorship policy
Compliance Week recently interviewed Charles Duross, former Chief of the DOJ’s Fraud Section’s FCPA Unit, to talk about the Department of Justice’s recently revised monitorship policy.
-
Basic Page‘Extraordinary cooperation’ pays off for PFS Investments
As regulators shift toward rewarding transparency, self-regulation and self-reporting, the way PFS Investments handled a longstanding problem serves as an example of how proactive remediation can turn a costly compliance error into a manageable regulatory outcome.
More from Regulatory Policy
-
ArticleCompliance must focus on corruption as EU and U.K. seek to tackle rising risks
Corruption isn’t something that happens somewhere else, in other countries and committed by other people. Nowhere is corruption-proof, and new rules being introduced in the EU and the U.K. aim to focus compliance officers on the full gamut of risks in all jurisdictions and every sector.
-
ArticleEmployment law in the age of AI: Compliance considerations
Employment law in the age of AI is evolving faster than many companies can keep pace. As more states enact AI laws and as more case law piles on, chief compliance officers and in-house counsel must ensure that compliance policies and procedures evolve as AI legal and compliance risks evolve.
-
ArticleCompliance must future-proof AI projects to meet evolving regulations
AI implementations are surging, but many new systems are being abandoned after companies have invested in expensive projects. Now evolving AI regulation is adding to the list of reasons why new systems may fail. Compliance must watch emerging regulatory developments and ensure that any new AI tools are capable of ...