The United Kingdom’s set of proposals to beef up anti-money laundering (AML) controls has received mixed reception from experts.
The Treasury released its consultation on the reform of its AML and countering the financing of terrorism (CFT) supervisory regime on June 30 following criticism from bodies including the Financial Action Task Force that the U.K.’s approach to oversight and monitoring was vulnerable and ineffective.
Currently, AML/CFT supervision in the United Kingdom is carried out by three statutory regulators—the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA); HMRC, the country’s tax watchdog; and the Gambling Commission—and 22 professional bodies representing accountancy and law firms.
THIS IS MEMBERS-ONLY CONTENT. To continue reading, choose one of the options below.
News and analysis for the well-informed compliance or audit exec.
Trial Membership
First week free, then $499 for an annual Membership
Cancel anytime within the trial period.
Annual Membership best value
Subscribe now for $365
Our lowest price ($1 per day) for one year.
The former CEO of NatWest’s decision to leak client details to the press regarding Nigel Farage is likely to cost the financial industry millions in new compliance checks as U.K. regulators prepare reviews into how banks treat people with extreme political views.
The Financial Conduct Authority announced the scope of its review into the treatment of U.K.-based politically exposed persons, the latest development in response to the Nigel Farage “debanking” scandal.
Switzerland’s Financial Market Supervisory Authority published new guidance to improve banks’ money laundering risk analysis after repeatedly identifying shortcomings during on-site supervisory reviews.
The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network announced a notice of proposed rulemaking to extend the deadline for companies created or registered in 2024 to file their initial beneficial ownership information reports.
The Securities and Exchange Commission adopted amendments to its rule covering fund names to ensure the regulation is appropriate to address new investment drivers, namely environmental, social, and governance matters.
The actions of companies like Amazon and new legislation passed in California prove it’s no longer a question of if companies will be required to disclose their greenhouse gas emissions—it’s a question of when, experts told attendees at CW’s virtual ESG Summit.
