Fallout from ‘debanking’ scandal suggests more U.K. bank reforms coming
By 
Neil Hodge2023-09-12T15:00:00
A banking boss’s decision to leak client details to a journalist is likely to cost the industry millions in new compliance checks as U.K. regulators prepare reviews into how banks treat people with extreme political views and whether they are subject to excessive and illegal monitoring.
NatWest’s now-former Group Chief Executive Alison Rose broke the most basic rule on confidentiality and told a BBC reporter that Nigel Farage—the U.K.’s face of Brexit and anti-immigration—had his bank account canceled because he didn’t meet the necessary wealth criteria.
Farage was a customer with Coutts bank, a financial institution that advises account holders be able to borrow at least 1 million pounds (U.S. $1.3 million) or hold £3 million in savings (U.S. $3.8 million) with it. Coutts is part of the NatWest Group.
Related articles
-
PremiumExperts: ICO apology to ex-CEO does not absolve NatWest of GDPR liability
Just because Alison Rose received a public apology from the U.K. Information Commissioner’s Office regarding the suggestion she might have violated the General Data Protection Regulation doesn’t mean NatWest could avoid sanction.
-
News BriefFCA flags potential regulatory breaches at NatWest regarding Farage scandal
An independent review into how NatWest handled the closure of politician Nigel Farage’s Coutts account uncovered potential regulatory breaches by the bank that are on the radar of the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority.
-
PremiumBank privacy processes questioned after U.K. ‘debanking’ scandal
The furor over NatWest Group’s decision to monitor and close the account of right-wing Brexit campaigner Nigel Farage—and then disclose the details to a journalist—has raised questions regarding whether other banks employ the same means to get rid of undesirable customers.
More from Opinion
-
OpinionEvidentiary Debt: The blind spot liability
On a gray Tuesday morning, the audit seemed routine. A stack of binders sat on the table, the compliance officer was confident, and the regulator’s tone was cordial. Then came the question that changed everything.
-
OpinionKristy Grant-Hart: Why I Chose to Be a Compliance and Ethics Officer
When people ask me why I chose to be a compliance and ethics officer, my answer is simple: because what we do changes the world.
-
OpinionCarrie Penman: Putting the “E” back in ethics and compliance
When I first stepped into this profession, my title was not “Chief Compliance Officer.” It was “Ethics Officer.” At Westinghouse, I was tasked with launching a program that, at the time, felt experimental: a global, enterprise-wide ethics initiative built not on rules, but on values. I traded in my career ...