Posted inRegulatory Enforcement

Court Threatens “Internal Affairs Doctrine”

California-based companies beware: An appeals court in that state has held that California’s plaintiff-friendly insider trading law can be applied to a company that is incorporated in Delaware. Typically, a principle called the “internal affairs doctrine” protects companies in California that are incorporated elsewhere from being subjected to the Golden State’s securities laws. The theory […]

Posted inRegulatory Enforcement

Reliance On “Creative Lawyering” Was Willful Violation

A federal appeals court recently issued a potentially troubling decision for corporations and their attorneys when it ruled that two insurance companies willfully failed to comply with a federal law protecting consumers from misuse of credit information despite reliance on advice by counsel that the original trial judge in the case said was legally correct. […]

Posted inRegulatory Enforcement

Electronic Discovery Proposal Influencing Judges

The U.S. Judicial Conference recently took an important step toward addressing electronic discovery issues by approving proposed amendments to the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure that will force e-discovery issues to be addressed early in the litigation process and protect companies from having to dig up data that is not reasonably accessible. Although the amendments […]

Posted inRegulatory Enforcement

Backdating Of Stock Options Remains Under Scrutiny

Heightened regulatory scrutiny of improperly backdating stock option grants shows no signs of abating. That’s amid reports of ongoing Securities and Exchange Commission investigations at several companies, and news of a tentative settlement by Analog Devices. Cagney As reported by Compliance Week in July, a number of companies—including software company Mercury Interactive Corp.—have been under […]

Posted inRegulatory Enforcement

Ineffective Compliance Program Violates False Claims Act?

In a closely watched case, the U.S. government is for the first time arguing that an ineffective compliance program could be enough to constitute a violation of the False Claims Act—the federal law that imposes liability for knowingly submitting to the government a false or fraudulent claim for payment. Shepard The suit, against Merck-Medco Managed […]

Gift this article