Are anti-bribery experts focusing on the wrong numbers?
To be sure, enforcement data is an important tool for companies to understand their anti-bribery regulatory risks. But relying solely on U.S. enforcement statistics reveals only part of the increasingly complex and multi-layered regulatory landscape that multinationals are facing today. Inside, a look at what can be accomplished when the ...
THIS IS MEMBERS-ONLY CONTENT
You are not logged in and do not have access to members-only content.
If you are already a registered user or a member, SIGN IN now.
Related articles
-
News BriefFormer bank CEO pleads guilty in Venezuela-linked fraud and sanctions violations
A former bank chief executive has pleaded guilty in a U.S. federal court to charges tied to a multimillion-dollar fraud and sanctions evasion scheme linked to Venezuela. This follows the U.S. removal of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro from the country, and has opened up the country for trading oil and ...
-
ArticleEx-Capula CCO refiles whistleblower retaliation lawsuit
The former U.S. chief compliance officer of London-based hedge fund Capula Investment Management, who alleged he was fired for escalating “significant regulatory compliance issues” to senior management, refiled his lawsuit in state court after his original complaint was dismissed in federal court on jurisdictional grounds.
-
ArticleDOJ makes good on corporate-friendly enforcement policy with Balt resolution
The ink was barely dry on the U.S. Department of Justice’s new corporate enforcement policy (CEP) when the agency announced it would not prosecute Balt SAS for alleged bribery violations.