- Chief Compliance Officer and VP of Legal Affairs, Arrow Electronics
By 
Aly McDevitt2021-05-20T13:00:00
Volkswagen Group of America Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer Stephanie Davis said halfway through the Dieselgate monitorship, “We are aware of the fear in our culture right now. That is something we are tackling, but it’s not something that fixes overnight.”
Now the monitorship is finished. How does one measure whether fear exists in a workplace culture in continuing recovery?
THIS IS MEMBERS-ONLY CONTENT. To continue reading, choose one of the options below.
News and analysis for the well-informed compliance or audit exec.
Register for free
Access one free, non-premium article each month.
Complimentary CPE webcasts, resources, and e-Books.
Annual Membership best value
Subscribe now for $365
Our lowest price ($1 per day) for one year.
Both JPMorgan Chase and Deutsche Bank retained their respective Jeffrey Epstein relationships for too long. Yet, there is a case to be made for why exiting a high-risk relationship too soon can become an inverse form of recklessness.
Why did JPMorgan Chase retain Jeffrey Epstein for more than a dozen years? How did the relationship persist despite glaring red flags? The “why” is straightforward; the “how” is more complicated.
Jeffrey Epstein’s designation as a high-risk client should have subjected him to enhanced due diligence that never appeared to occur, most notably at Deutsche Bank. Instead, Epstein was allowed to continue his misconduct despite numerous red flags.
