No time like present to tackle thorny problem of off-channel comms
By 
Aaron Nicodemus2023-11-17T21:58:00
For years, executives, managers, and employees at broker-dealers, investment advisory firms, and swap dealers used unauthorized communication channels to conduct company business.
They texted clients and colleagues from their personal devices. They exchanged emails from personal accounts. And, perhaps most systematically, they sent thousands of business-related messages that were not recorded by their employer on apps like WhatsApp, WeChat, Signal, and Slack.
So, what’s the big deal? Why does using unauthorized channels matter?
Related articles
-
News BriefLatest off-channel comms sweep nets SEC, CFTC $477M in fines
Two regulators doled out more than $477 million in fines on a new group of broker-dealers, investment advisers, and swaps dealers that failed to maintain and preserve the electronic communications of their employees, bringing total such fines issued since 2021 to $3.2 billion.
-
PremiumCompliance officers share lack of faith in off-channel comms monitoring policies
Addressing employee use of off-channel communications for conducting business was clearly on the minds of compliance officers who responded to our “Inside the Mind of the CCO” survey, but their confidence in their related policies and procedures was surprisingly weak.
-
News BriefSEC lauds cooperators, whistleblowers in FY23 enforcement results
A big year for disgorgement helped the Securities and Exchange Commission to its second highest total of financial remedies ordered in a single year in fiscal year 2023.
More from Opinion
-
OpinionWhy the EU’s new Machinery Regulation is a wake-up call on cybersecurity
The European manufacturing industry is on the cusp of a regulatory shift that promises to reshape how machines are designed and operated.
-
OpinionWrite supply chain resilience into the contract
The only thing constant is change. Shouldn’t we be ready for that in our contracts?
-
OpinionThe AI audit burden: Why ‘Explainable AI’ is the key
AI decisions are only defensible when the reasoning behind them is visible, traceable, and auditable. Explainable AI delivers that visibility, turning black-box outputs into documented logic that compliance officers can stand behind when regulators, auditors, or stakeholders demand answers.