Aon unit to pay $1.5M for misleading pension fund
By 
Jeff Dale2024-01-26T18:22:00
A Chicago-based investment adviser and its former partner agreed to pay nearly $1.6 million in combined penalties to settle charges by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that they mislead a Pennsylvania school pension fund.
Aon Investments USA agreed to pay a $1 million civil penalty and more than $540,000 in disgorgement and prejudgment interest for misleading clients, the SEC announced in a press release Thursday. Aon’s former partner, Claire Shaughnessy, agreed to pay a $30,000 civil penalty. Both the firm and Shaughnessy also agreed to be censured.
The firm and Shaughnessy were responsible for calculating investment returns for the Pennsylvania Public School Employees’ Retirement System (PSERS), according to the SEC’s order.
THIS IS MEMBERS-ONLY CONTENT
You are not logged in and do not have access to members-only content.
If you are already a registered user or a member, SIGN IN now.
Related articles
-
News BriefVanEck fined $1.8M over influencer promo nondisclosure
Van Eck Associates agreed to pay $1.75 million as part of a settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission regarding its alleged failure to properly disclose the planned involvement of a social media influencer in the launch of an exchange-traded fund.
-
News BriefSPAC to avoid $1.5M SEC fine for failing to disclose pre-IPO merger talks
Northern Star Investment Corp. II faced a penalty of $1.5 million to settle charges laid by the Securities and Exchange Commission that it made misleading statements in its January 2021 initial public offering.
-
News BriefOEP Capital Advisors fined $4M over policy failures
OEP Capital Advisors agreed to pay a $4 million penalty as part of a settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission addressing alleged deficiencies regarding the prevention of misuse of material nonpublic information.
More from Regulatory Enforcement
-
News BriefAdobe agrees to $150M settlement over alleged cancellation fee violations
Adobe agreed to a $150 million settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice over accusations that it concealed software termination fees and made it difficult for customers to cancel.
-
ArticleU.K. competition regulator ‘very likely’ to use new enforcement powers despite government’s pro-growth agenda
New powers granted to the U.K.’s main competition watchdog will result in greater scrutiny, tougher enforcement, and a stark warning for companies to review their sales and marketing promotions—especially since some practices have been pushed firmly into the spotlight thanks to legislation that came into effect last year.
-
ArticleSEC enforcement priorities revert back to basics
Recent pronouncements made by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission leadership, alongside the recent overhaul of the SEC Enforcement Manual, collectively signal a back-to-basics enforcement approach that appears beneficial for companies in their dealings with the agency.