Binance’s compliance past, future detailed
By 
Aaron Nicodemus2023-11-29T21:55:00
There are a slew of compliance lessons to be learned from the $4.3 billion settlement that Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, reached with a handful of U.S. government agencies.
The largest of those lessons is the significant penalties and company leadership, including the chief compliance officer, held personally responsible for their alleged attempts to evade U.S. laws to hold onto the exchange’s most valuable clients.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) detailed in its charging document how Binance did not comply with U.S. laws and regulations related to the anti-money laundering (AML) provisions of the Bank Secrecy Act, which also requires new customers to be vetted and transactions to be monitored for suspicious activities.
Related articles
-
OpinionBinance CEO got 4 months in prison. FTX’s got 25 years. Was compliance the difference?
Why the wild disparity in the sentences of Binance’s Changpeng Zhao and FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried? Aaron Nicodemus argues the performance of the compliance teams at the two cryptocurrency exchanges was as big a contrast as the penalties earned by their respective founders.
-
News BriefFINTRAC fines Binance $4.4M over AML/CFT violations
The Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada imposed a penalty of approximately CAD$6 million (U.S. $4.4 million) against crypto platform Binance over alleged noncompliance with the country’s anti-money laundering/countering the financing of terrorism law.
-
News BriefFinCEN analysis: Most common identity-related suspicious activities
Fraud remains the leading form of identity-related suspicious activity cited in Bank Secrecy Act reports by a large margin, while technologies enable greater overall risks around exploitation, according to new research from the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network.
More from Regulatory Enforcement
-
Basic Page‘Extraordinary cooperation’ pays off for PFS Investments
As regulators shift toward rewarding transparency, self-regulation and self-reporting, the way PFS Investments handled a longstanding problem serves as an example of how proactive remediation can turn a costly compliance error into a manageable regulatory outcome.
-
ArticleDOJ charges Texas businessmen in alleged bribery scheme over PEMEX oil contracts
The Department of Justice says two Mexican businessmen living in Texas allegedly bribed Mexican officials to secure $2.5 million in contracts with Petróleos Mexicanos, Mexico’s state-owned oil company, and a subsidiary.
-
ArticleMatch.com agrees to pay $14 million in FTC settlement over subscription practices
Match.com, the online dating site, will pay $14 million and make changes to its membership terms to settle allegations that it made cancellations difficult and made misrepresentations to members, the Federal Trade Commission said Tuesday.