Bribes, falsified records cost Beam Suntory $19.6M in FCPA settlement
By 
Jaclyn Jaeger2020-10-28T18:43:00
Alcoholic beverage maker Beam Suntory agreed to pay $19.6 million to resolve Foreign Corrupt Practices Act charges of improper payments by its Indian subsidiary.
Related articles
-
Blog
Beam Suntory to pay $8M in FCPA case
Beam Suntory subsidiary Beam India was charged by the SEC with making improper payments to various government officials to obtain or retain business in the Indian market. Beam was fined $8M, but neither admitted nor denied the the allegations.
-
News BriefFTC complaint accuses LA Fitness parent companies of blocking easy membership exits
The Federal Trade Commission filed a complaint against LA Fitness’ parent companies, citing difficulties canceling memberships, a month after a court blocked the agency’s click-to-cancel rule.
-
WebcastCPE Webcast: Banking Compliance in 2025: Key Trends and Future-Proofing Strategies
In addition to a loosening of traditional banking regulation and supervision in areas like capital requirements, stress testing and liquidity, U.S. banking regulators have indicated they will be more receptive to innovation than the previous administration, particularly in the use of Artificial Intelligence, and in digital assets.
More from Regulatory Enforcement
-
ArticleJudge orders CVS to pay nearly $290M for Medicare false claims
CVS’s Caremark division knowingly overcharged Medicare for prescription drugs and must pay nearly $290 million, a Pennsylvania federal judge has ordered.
-
News BriefSEC charges duo in $275 million water vending machine Ponzi scheme
The owner of a water machine vending company and a portfolio manager were allegedly behind a Ponzi-like scheme that raised more than $275 million, according to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
-
Basic Page‘Extraordinary cooperation’ pays off for PFS Investments
As regulators shift toward rewarding transparency, self-regulation and self-reporting, the way PFS Investments handled a longstanding problem serves as an example of how proactive remediation can turn a costly compliance error into a manageable regulatory outcome.