FRC probing EY audit of Veolia unit
By 
Kyle Brasseur2023-01-19T15:10:00
The U.K. Financial Reporting Council (FRC) launched an investigation into Big Four audit firm EY’s work at Stirling Water Seafield Finance.
The probe, announced Jan. 13, is focused on EY’s audit of the financial statements of Stirling for the year ended December 2019. The investigation does not relate to any individuals at this time.
The FRC offered no further details on the specifics of its probe.
Related articles
-
News BriefFRC investigating EY audits of Made.com, unnamed firm
The U.K. Financial Reporting Council announced the launch of two separate investigations regarding audits performed by Big Four firm EY, including a probe into the 2021 financials of collapsed online furniture retailer Made.com.
-
News BriefPwC fined $6.6M over Babcock International, Devonport audit breaches
The U.K. Financial Reporting Council fined Big Four firm PwC more than £5.6 million (U.S. $6.6 million) for failing to challenge management, obtain sufficient evidence, and follow basic requirements while conducting audits of a British defense contractor and its subsidiary.
-
News BriefFRC probing PwC audits at collapsed property group Intu
The U.K. Financial Reporting Council launched an investigation into Big Four firm PwC’s audit work at collapsed real estate investment trust Intu Properties.
More from Regulatory Enforcement
-
News BriefCFPB scraps bad-actor registry, citing cost-benefit issues
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau shut down a registry of non-bank financial firms that broke consumer laws. The agency cites the costs being ”not justified by the speculative and unquantified benefits to consumers.”
-
ArticleSenate Democrats question Vought on comments about closing CFPB in months
Senate Democrats warned OMB Director Russell Vought Tuesday that it would be illegal for the Trump administration to shut down the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, citing a recent court decision barring actions that could severely harm the agency.
-
PremiumAssessing the impact of the DOJ’s monitorship policy six months in
It has been nearly six months now since the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) Criminal Division released its memorandum on the selection of compliance monitors. This article provides a critical analysis of the monitorships that received early terminations, those that remain in place, and the broader compliance lessons they impart.