FTC sues Adobe alleging hidden subscription cancellation fees
By 
Adrianne Appel2024-06-17T20:41:00
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) took aim at Adobe and two executives Monday for making it too difficult for consumers to cancel their subscriptions and often charging a fee to do so.
The Department of Justice filed a complaint in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on behalf of the FTC, alleging Adobe hid from consumers that they would be subjected to a fee for canceling a subscription. Adobe violated the Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act (ROSCA), the agencies alleged.
The FTC began investigating Adobe’s subscription cancellation fees and policies in 2022. In November, the FTC notified Adobe that it could face consent negotiations concerning its subscription fees.
THIS IS MEMBERS-ONLY CONTENT
You are not logged in and do not have access to members-only content.
If you are already a registered user or a member, SIGN IN now.
Related articles
-
News BriefFTC orders Vroom to pay $1M after it ‘sped right past compliance’
Vroom, the former online used car dealer, agreed to pay $1 million to settle allegations by the Federal Trade Commission that it didn’t abide by consumer protection laws, including providing prompt refunds.
-
ArticleOwner of medical supply company faces 35 years for alleged false claims, kickbacks
The owner of a medical supply company allegedly billed federal health programs $30 million for items that were unnecessary and tainted by kickbacks, according to the Department of Justice (DOJ).
-
ArticleFormer TD branch manager admits laundering $92 million for gift card bribes
A former TD Bank assistant branch manager in New York was instrumental in helping a $653 million drug money laundering operation, known as “David’s Network,” wash dirty money through the bank, the U.S. Department of Justice announced Tuesday.
More from Regulatory Enforcement
-
ArticleTeledyne fined $1.5M for supplying obsolete parts to Navy
Teledyne will pay more than $1.5 million to settle allegations it supplied electronic parts to the Navy that deviated from specifications, a violation of the False Claims Act (FCA). But its cooperation with prosecutors earned it a credit, according to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ).
-
ArticleTungston rod importer pays $54.4M to settle DOJ tariff fraud allegations
An industrial products distributor has agreed to pay $54.4 million to settle allegations, first made by a whistleblower, that it evaded tariffs and violated the federal False Claims Act.
-
ArticleTariff evasion enforcement: The new FCPA
Companies that import goods into the United States will face heightened enforcement scrutiny for attempted acts of customs fraud, including tariff evasion, under the Trump administration. Thus, chief compliance officers and in-house counsel face a new kind of pressure to ensure they are mitigating risk in this area.