SEC fines five in latest custody rule sweep
By 
Kyle Brasseur2023-09-06T20:36:00
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced penalties against five investment advisers as part of its second targeted sweep regarding violations of its custody rule and Form ADV requirements.
The firms, each agreeing to pay fines ranging from $50,000 to $225,000, were accused of failing to comply with requirements related to the safekeeping of client assets, according to an SEC press release Tuesday. Three of the firms were cited for disclosure failures regarding audits of their private fund clients’ financial statements.
The custody rule, part of the Investment Advisers Act, requires advisers who have custody of clients’ funds or securities to follow specific requirements to prevent the loss, misuse, or misappropriation of those assets. The SEC in February proposed amendments to the rule that would require registered investment advisers to place nearly any asset, not just cash and securities, with qualified custodians.
THIS IS MEMBERS-ONLY CONTENT
You are not logged in and do not have access to members-only content.
If you are already a registered user or a member, SIGN IN now.
Related articles
-
News BriefAmerican Infrastructure Funds to pay $1.6M over fiduciary duty breaches
California-based investment adviser American Infrastructure Funds agreed to pay more than $1.6 million to settle charges by the Securities and Exchange Commission regarding multiple breaches of its fiduciary duty to clients.
-
News Brief
Mortgage industry adviser fined $100K over long-running compliance lapses
Mortgage Industry Advisory Corp. agreed to pay $100,000 to settle allegations levied by the Securities and Exchange Commission it failed to adopt and implement written compliance policies and procedures, conduct annual reviews, and establish and enforce a code of ethics.
-
News BriefSEC proposes expansion of RIA custody rule
The Securities and Exchange Commission proposed registered investment advisers be required to place nearly any asset, not just cash and securities, with qualified custodians, thereby expanding the scope of client assets.
More from Regulatory Enforcement
-
PremiumDelayed UK antitrust case underscores compliance, reputational risks
Antitrust infringement cases in the United Kingdom can run on for years, but there’s a question whether issuing fines that are dwarfed by the revenues of those organisations involved is a worthy deterrent—particularly if they are imposed over a decade after the misconduct ended. It’s also debatable whether the first ...
-
News BriefFTC sues Uber over deceptive subscriptions, a rare move for consumers by Trump officials
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed a lawsuit against Uber, alleging the ride-hailing company signed customers up for its Uber One subscription without consent, then made it hard for them to cancel. The move marks the U.S. government’s latest broadside against big tech companies, and the first major action from ...
-
News BriefCFPB pullback signals further shift toward industry-friendly regulation
The U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau continues to unravel amid pressure from Trump administration officials to shutter the agency. Not only has the agency informed its employees that it will no longer be a watchdog for the financial services industry, it has also laid off employees despite court orders blocking ...