Wells Fargo unit fined $7M for AML transaction monitoring failures
By 
Aaron Nicodemus2022-05-20T18:26:00
For the second time in five years, a subsidiary of Wells Fargo has been charged by the Securities and Exchange Commission with failing to file suspicious activity reports in a timely manner due to deficiencies in the system it used to flag transactions.
Related articles
-
News BriefUBS unit fined $3.75M for options trading reporting violations
UBS Securities agreed to pay $3.75 million to settle allegations brought by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority that its failure to adequately supervise compliance staff led to millions of violations of options trading reporting requirements.
-
ArticleFINRA fines Wells Fargo subsidiaries $2.25M for recordkeeping violations
Two Wells Fargo broker-dealers agreed to jointly pay a $2.25 million fine to settle charges levied by FINRA regarding a failure to store approximately 13 million customer records in the proper format over a 17-year span.
-
ArticleFINRA sanctions Wells Fargo $2M over variable annuity switches
Two Wells Fargo subsidiaries were ordered to pay more than $2 million due to supervisory failures regarding the switching of customers’ variable annuities, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority announced.
More from Regulatory Enforcement
-
ArticleOFAC cracks down on Iran’s oil trade with new sanctions sweep
More than 50 people and 50 ships connected to a top Iranian official were added to the U.S. Treasury’s sanctions list on Wednesday, according to the Office of Foreign Assets Control.
-
ArticleKentucky is latest state to file suit against Temu for alleged privacy violations
Kentucky took aim at Chinese company Temu, alleging in a lawsuit that it counterfeited popular Kentucky-designed merchandise and violated customers’ privacy.
-
ArticleU.S. Department of Labor cracks down on child labor violations
The Department of Labor is using poultry processing company Mar-Jac Poultry as an example of what will happen when companies repeatedly employ underage workers in hazardous conditions. Hint: Companies can’t pin the blame on staffing agencies.