By
Aaron Nicodemus2024-07-30T15:43:00
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) ordered Western International Securities to pay $1.5 million for failing to implement a supervisory system to detect and respond to excessive trading, the firm’s fifth consent order with the regulator since 2019.
California-based Western will pay a $475,000 fine and $1 million in restitution, plus interest, to settle the allegations, according to FINRA’s order, published Monday.
Factors that should be considered to detect excessive trading include “the cost-to-equity ratio, turnover rate, and the use of in-and-out trading in a customer’s account,” FINRA said in its order.
2024-07-11T19:04:00Z By Aaron Nicodemus
UBS Financial Services, a subsidiary of the Swiss banking giant UBS, has been fined $850,000 for failing to properly monitor transactions between its broker-dealers and third parties.
2024-05-30T18:41:00Z By Aaron Nicodemus
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority fined a Bank of America subsidiary $90,080 for filing untimely or inaccurate notifications related to security distributions and failing to adopt an adequate supervisory system.
2024-05-10T16:55:00Z By Kyle Brasseur
Merrill Lynch was assessed an $825,000 penalty by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority for alleged supervision failures regarding the execution of marketable equity orders entered into its electronic order systems.
2025-10-29T20:04:00Z By Oscar Gonzalez
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau shut down a registry of non-bank financial firms that broke consumer laws. The agency cites the costs being ”not justified by the speculative and unquantified benefits to consumers.”
2025-10-28T21:11:00Z By Adrianne Appel
Senate Democrats warned OMB Director Russell Vought Tuesday that it would be illegal for the Trump administration to shut down the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, citing a recent court decision barring actions that could severely harm the agency.
2025-10-23T20:36:00Z By Jaclyn Jaeger
It has been nearly six months now since the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) Criminal Division released its memorandum on the selection of compliance monitors. This article provides a critical analysis of the monitorships that received early terminations, those that remain in place, and the broader compliance lessons they impart.
Site powered by Webvision Cloud