- Chief Compliance Officer and VP of Legal Affairs, Arrow Electronics
By Aaron Nicodemus2024-07-30T15:43:00
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) ordered Western International Securities to pay $1.5 million for failing to implement a supervisory system to detect and respond to excessive trading, the firm’s fifth consent order with the regulator since 2019.
California-based Western will pay a $475,000 fine and $1 million in restitution, plus interest, to settle the allegations, according to FINRA’s order, published Monday.
Factors that should be considered to detect excessive trading include “the cost-to-equity ratio, turnover rate, and the use of in-and-out trading in a customer’s account,” FINRA said in its order.
2024-07-11T19:04:00Z By Aaron Nicodemus
UBS Financial Services, a subsidiary of the Swiss banking giant UBS, has been fined $850,000 for failing to properly monitor transactions between its broker-dealers and third parties.
2024-05-30T18:41:00Z By Aaron Nicodemus
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority fined a Bank of America subsidiary $90,080 for filing untimely or inaccurate notifications related to security distributions and failing to adopt an adequate supervisory system.
2024-05-10T16:55:00Z By Kyle Brasseur
Merrill Lynch was assessed an $825,000 penalty by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority for alleged supervision failures regarding the execution of marketable equity orders entered into its electronic order systems.
2025-07-08T19:50:00Z By Aaron Nicodemus
Federal banking regulators have laid the blame for Discover Financial Services charging merchants $1 billion in excessive credit card fees over 17 years squarely at the feet of company executives.
2025-07-07T19:02:00Z By Aaron Nicodemus
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has dropped a $95 million enforcement action against Navy Federal Credit Union, the latest regulatory pullback by the agency under President Donald Trump.
2025-07-07T17:45:00Z By Neil Hodge
The UK’s financial regulator has had a rough ride over the past couple of years as its strategy to “name and shame” firms it opened investigations into was widely slammed by the industry and lawmakers over concerns that companies could be unfairly maligned.
Site powered by Webvision Cloud