Westpac ordered to pay $1.2M in insider trading case
By 
Jeff Dale2024-02-05T22:15:00
Westpac Banking Corp. was assessed a maximum fine of 1.8 million Australian dollars (U.S. $1.2 million) to address charges levied by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) of insider trading related to an interest rate swap transaction.
Westpac must also pay AUS$8 million (U.S. $5.2 million) to cover litigation and investigation costs, ASIC announced in a press release Jan. 31. Australia’s Federal Court sided with the regulator in the case.
ASIC noted because of the alleged misconduct occurring in October 2016, the maximum penalty was significantly lower. The current penalty for similar misconduct is about AUS$15.7 million (U.S. $10.2 million) minimum for corporations and AUS$782.5 million (U.S. $507.3 million) maximum for large entities.
THIS IS MEMBERS-ONLY CONTENT
You are not logged in and do not have access to members-only content.
If you are already a registered user or a member, SIGN IN now.
Related articles
-
PremiumEthics education is key, says Tom Hardin AKA “Tipper X”
Tom Hardin AKA “Tipper X” went from a young trader with his whole career ahead of him to an inside trader who got caught, acted as a Federal Bureau of Investigation informant for two years, and pleaded guilty to a felony.
-
News BriefFederal Reserve Bank of Richmond examiner pleads guilty to insider trading
A bank examiner and senior manager at the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond pled guilty to insider trading after allegedly misappropriating confidential information on seven banks to make profitable trades.
-
News BriefCharter Communications fined $25M over stock buyback violations
The Securities and Exchange Commission fined Charter Communications $25 million for violating internal accounting control requirements related to stock buybacks.
More from Regulatory Enforcement
-
ArticleFrench investigators target anticompetitive practices in largest accounting firms
Major accountancy firms in France are under investigation for anti-competitive practices. The French competition watchdog embarked on a series of “unannounced inspections” and removed documents relating to audit and reporting on Jan. 13.
-
ArticleEU investigation into Grok may expose problems with DSA rather than compliance failings
The European Commission has launched a formal investigation against Elon Musk’s X under the Digital Services Act over fears that its AI tool Grok may be producing and disseminating illegal material.
-
ArticleFormer ADM execs inflated operating profits, SEC alleges
Three former executives at Archer-Daniels-Midland intentionally misled investors by inflating the performance of the company’s Nutrition unit, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has alleged.