By
Aaron Nicodemus2024-09-03T15:47:00
The Federal Reserve Board will require more than 30 of country’s largest banks to maintain a minimum percentage of capital in reserve, a percentage which the Fed calculated based on their complexity and whether they are considered a global systemically important bank.
The capital requirements, which take effect Oct. 1, affect 32 banks and holding companies with $100 billion or more in assets, the Fed announced in a press release Wednesday. Previously, capital requirements were only imposed on financial institutions with more than $700 billion in assets, a threshold which applied to a small number of very large banks, the Fed noted.
The move to increase capital requirements was made in response to the collapse of three mid-sized banks in 2023: Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank, and First Republic Bank.
You are not logged in and do not have access to members-only content.
If you are already a registered user or a member, SIGN IN now.
2025-03-19T13:00:00Z By Aaron Nicodemus
Federal Reserve Board member Michelle Bowman has been nominated as the board’s vice chair for supervision, a position that oversees regulation of the nation’s largest banks.
2024-09-12T12:46:00Z By Aaron Nicodemus
Facing intense pressure from the banking industry, the Federal Reserve Board may scale back two controversial rule proposals aimed at reducing risks of bank failures in the event of a market downturn.
2023-07-12T17:58:00Z By Aaron Nicodemus
The Federal Reserve Board will propose increasing capital standards for large banks and holding companies to build up the banking system’s resiliency against unanticipated market shocks.
2026-03-19T14:50:00Z By Ruth Prickett
Corruption isn’t something that happens somewhere else, in other countries and committed by other people. Nowhere is corruption-proof, and new rules being introduced in the EU and the U.K. aim to focus compliance officers on the full gamut of risks in all jurisdictions and every sector.
2026-03-18T00:00:00Z By Jaclyn Jaeger
Employment law in the age of AI is evolving faster than many companies can keep pace. As more states enact AI laws and as more case law piles on, chief compliance officers and in-house counsel must ensure that compliance policies and procedures evolve as AI legal and compliance risks evolve.
2026-03-16T20:22:00Z By Ruth Prickett
AI implementations are surging, but many new systems are being abandoned after companies have invested in expensive projects. Now evolving AI regulation is adding to the list of reasons why new systems may fail. Compliance must watch emerging regulatory developments and ensure that any new AI tools are capable of ...
Site powered by Webvision Cloud