- Chief Compliance Officer and VP of Legal Affairs, Arrow Electronics
Provided by 
MyComplianceOffice2018-08-21T11:45:00
Conduct risk poses an existential threat to companies across industries and jurisdictions because regulators, auditors and other oversight professionals are increasingly holding senior managers accountable for the actions of individuals associated with a firm.
THIS IS MEMBERS-ONLY CONTENT. To continue reading, choose one of the options below.
News and analysis for the well-informed compliance or audit exec.
Annual Membership best value
Subscribe now for $365
Our lowest price ($1 per day) for one year.
Register for free
Receive the CW newsletter and access CPE webcasts.
Three federal banking regulators issued guidance on the risks posed by the use of third-party financial technology firms to deliver bank deposit products and services to customers.
As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to advance rapidly and organizations expand their usage to optimize efficiency and productivity, implementing internal AI policies to ensure regulatory compliance and minimize exposure remains a hot topic.
A lack of risk visibility is causing companies to reject customers–and potentially lose money–over fears they might be in danger of violating rules around anti-money laundering and sanctions regulations.
To help investors gain a better understanding of cyber risk, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has created sweeping new rules—forcing companies to take a more proactive approach to cybersecurity.
Spending countless hours tracking down controls evidence for your audit and compliance activities is an annoyance at best and a major drag on productivity and effectiveness at worst.
Financial risk is one of the third-party risk management (TPRM) domains most likely to directly harm your organization.
