SEC commissioners question best execution ruling in Huntleigh Advisors case
By 
Aaron Nicodemus2023-02-28T17:48:00
A St. Louis-based investment adviser and its affiliate agreed to pay $893,502 to settle charges laid by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regarding failure to disclose conflicts of interest to their advisory clients over eight years.
The SEC charged Huntleigh Advisors and affiliate Datatex Investment Services with violating federal securities law from 2015-22 by not properly disclosing conflicts related to transaction fees, revenue sharing payments, mutual fund share class selection practices that generated fees, and failing to report some of these fees to the SEC, the agency said Monday in an administrative proceeding.
The SEC also said Huntleigh and Datatex breached their duty of care, including best execution for practices regarding the recommendation of mutual fund shares.
THIS IS MEMBERS-ONLY CONTENT
You are not logged in and do not have access to members-only content.
If you are already a registered user or a member, SIGN IN now.
Related articles
-
News BriefSEC commissioner calls out pitfalls in regulators’ structured data efforts
SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce warned about “potential pitfalls” with structured data, which regulators and lawmakers have embraced as a way to make data accessible and easy to use.
-
News Brief
Moors & Cabot to pay $1.9M for conflict of interest disclosure lapses
Investment adviser Moors & Cabot reached a $1.9 million settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission over allegations the firm didn’t fairly disclose conflicts of interest associated with incentive payments it received from two unaffiliated clearing brokers.
-
ArticleS&P Global fined $2.5M over conflict of interest lapses
Credit rating agency S&P Global Ratings agreed to pay $2.5 million and improve its compliance practices to settle allegations by the SEC that its marketing team pressured the ratings team concerning the rating of a particular mortgage-backed security transaction.
More from Regulatory Enforcement
-
ArticleCMA holds companies responsible for false claims, fake reviews ‘throughout supply chain’
Companies face large fines if they spread false marketing claims or fake reviews about their products and services—as well as those by suppliers—under a toughened competition regime in the U.K. aimed at enhancing consumer protection.
-
ArticleFTC warns VISA and other processors that company policies may lead to debanking
Visa, Mastercard, PayPal, and Stripe have received letters from the Federal Trade Commission, warning the companies to end any policies or terms of service that may result in the “debanking” of customers.
-
ArticleDOJ makes good on corporate-friendly enforcement policy with Balt resolution
The ink was barely dry on the U.S. Department of Justice’s new corporate enforcement policy (CEP) when the agency announced it would not prosecute Balt SAS for alleged bribery violations.