S&P Global fined $2.5M over conflict of interest lapses
By 
Adrianne Appel2022-11-15T18:51:00
Credit rating agency S&P Global Ratings agreed to pay $2.5 million and improve its compliance practices to settle allegations by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that its marketing team pressured the ratings team concerning the rating of a particular mortgage-backed security transaction.
Ratings agencies are prohibited from issuing a rating if a sales and marketing employee tries to influence the determination, noted Osman Nawaz, chief of SEC’s Complex Financial Instruments Unit, in a press release Monday.
For this reason, S&P Global required internal communications between the analytics department and marketing department to be “chaperoned,” or sent through its compliance department for review and redaction, to make sure they didn’t violate conflict of interest rules. This check appeared to fail regarding the residential mortgage-backed security transaction, according to the SEC’s order.
THIS IS MEMBERS-ONLY CONTENT
You are not logged in and do not have access to members-only content.
If you are already a registered user or a member, SIGN IN now.
Related articles
-
News Brief
SEC fines Corvex Management $1M for SPACs conflicts
Corvex Management agreed to pay $1 million to settle allegations it failed to disclose personnel ownership in certain sponsors of special purpose acquisition companies and didn’t have policies and procedures reasonably designed to thwart conflicts of interest.
-
News Brief
SEC commissioners question best execution ruling in Huntleigh Advisors case
Huntleigh Advisors and affiliate Datatex Investment Services agreed to pay $893,502 to settle charges laid by the Securities and Exchange Commission regarding failure to disclose conflicts of interest to their advisory clients over eight years.
-
ArticleS&P Global fined $79K over alleged 2016-17 dealings with sanctioned Rosneft
Financial analytics provider S&P Global agreed to pay $78,750 as part of a settlement with the Office of Foreign Assets Control regarding alleged dealings with sanctioned Russian state-owned oil company Rosneft in 2016 and 2017.
More from Regulatory Enforcement
-
News BriefFTC sues Uber over deceptive subscriptions, a rare move for consumers by Trump officials
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed a lawsuit against Uber, alleging the ride-hailing company signed customers up for its Uber One subscription without consent, then made it hard for them to cancel. The move marks the U.S. government’s latest broadside against big tech companies, and the first major action from ...
-
News BriefCFPB pullback signals further shift toward industry-friendly regulation
The U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau continues to unravel amid pressure from Trump administration officials to shutter the agency. Not only has the agency informed its employees that it will no longer be a watchdog for the financial services industry, it has also laid off employees despite court orders blocking ...
-
News BriefTrump’s CFPB, dismissing Comerica case, continues to cut down Biden-era lawsuits
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau dropped yet another consumer protection lawsuit against a bank or fintech provider since Donald Trump was sworn in as president in January. This time, it was with Comerica Bank.