SEC issues ‘highest penalty to date’ in data analytics case
By 
Jaclyn Jaeger2022-04-19T20:06:00
The Securities and Exchange Commission credited its risk-based data analytics initiative for resulting in its “highest penalty to date” against a publicly traded company that engaged in improper accounting to boost its quarterly earnings per share.
Related articles
-
News Brief
Gentex fined $4M for bonus compensation accounting lapses
Gentex Corp. agreed to pay $4 million as part of a settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission regarding alleged failures in its internal accounting controls that affected executive and employee bonus compensation programs over several years.
-
ArticleSEC touts data analytics in launching 3 insider trading cases
The Securities and Exchange Commission utilized data analytics to detect suspicious trading activity and form the basis of three separate insider trading cases.
-
ArticleRegulators catching up on use of analytics; compliance better take notice
If your company isn’t making optimal use of data to enhance its compliance program, now is the time to start—before it’s too late.
More from Regulatory Enforcement
-
ArticleFormer startup CEO gets 7 years in prison for $175M fraud against JPMorgan Chase
Charlie Javice, a former CEO who duped JPMorgan Chase into purchasing her start up company for $175 million, has been ordered to forfeit more than $22 million by the Department of Justice (DOJ) and to spend 7 years in jail.
-
ArticleGeorgia Tech to pay $875,000 for allegations brought by compliance officers
Georgia Tech Research Corp. (GTRC) has agreed to pay $875,000 to settle allegations first raised by two compliance officers that its cybersecurity protocols violated acceptable standards for defense contractors, the Department of Justice (DOJ) said.
-
ArticleTractor Supply Company hit with $1.35M fine for alleged California privacy violations
Tractor Supply Company has agreed to get into compliance with California’s consumer privacy law and to pay a $1.35 million fine—the largest yet by California—to settle allegations it violated the privacy rights of customers and job applicants.