- Chief Compliance Officer and VP of Legal Affairs, Arrow Electronics
By 
Jeff Dale2022-08-23T19:14:00
Social media company Snap reached a $35 million settlement in principle earlier this month to resolve an Illinois class-action lawsuit alleging violations of the state’s Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) through the collection of “facial biometric identifiers” without users’ consent.
According to the class-action complaint, violations of the BIPA arose with Snapchat’s “Lenses” feature, which allows users to add special effects to photos and works by “scanning the geometry of a person’s face.”
As part of the agreement, Snap must implement an in-application notice to Illinois users about how faces, hands, and/or voices might be used to make features such as Lenses and voice commands work.
THIS IS MEMBERS-ONLY CONTENT. To continue reading, choose one of the options below.
News and analysis for the well-informed compliance or audit exec.
Annual Membership best value
Subscribe now for $365
Our lowest price ($1 per day) for one year.
Register for free
Receive the CW newsletter and access CPE webcasts.
Facial recognition company Clearview AI reached a preliminary settlement in a class action lawsuit alleging it violated the Illinois Biometric Privacy Act, with the company agreeing to compensate victims with stake in the company.
Businesses that make false or unsubstantiated claims regarding facial recognition and other biometric technologies could face enforcement from the Federal Trade Commission, the agency warned in a policy statement.
Calling it a “sabbatical” and admitting he’s “ready for a time out,” longtime Snap Chief Compliance Officer Dominic Perella announced he’s planning to step down in the spring.
Michael Macko, deputy director of enforcement at the California Privacy Protection Agency, described priorities for the agency now and in the near future during a recent board meeting.
Eight large companies, including Mastercard and JPMorgan Chase, have been ordered by the Federal Trade Commission to provide detailed reports about their possibly secret use of artificial intelligence to track customers and use the information to set prices.
The General Data Protection Regulation has been in force for nearly six years. Some industries—and some companies—have been more prone to fall foul of the rules than others.
